For bird wildlife photography, having a long telephoto lens is a tremendous advantage.
It allows you to you to have your subject large in your frame while keeping your distance.
Most wildlife photographers occasionally crop their images significantly, since wildlife usually stays pretty far away.
So sharp lenses also give you a huge advantage.
There are basically three classes of Canon lenses that are available to you. Consumer Grade telephoto zoom lenses are the most affordable, but unfortunately, consumer grade telephoto zooms are often pretty soft at the telephoto end of the zoom. I have friends that shoot with these lenses, and I often hear them express frustration that they aren’t able to come home with sharp pictures.
Part of the reason for this is simple lens quality On the other end of the spectrum are what we might callHigh End Professional Grade telephoto prime lenses. These lenses are extremely sharp and fast, and they are also large, bulky, and wildly expensive lenses. Most of them are too large to be handheld; you must mount them on an sturdy tripod. In this class of lens, I dream about the Canon EF 600mm f/4 IS II USM, which will only set you back about $12,700 as I write this.
These are wonderful lenses, but they are out of the price range of many photographers, and my blog is designed for photographers who, like myself, live on a budget. My target is a system of camera+ lens+ accessories totaling $2500 or less.
Thankfully, these are not our only choices in lens class. Canon also makes professional quality lenses that are more compact than their high end counterparts, but are not nearly expensive. These lenses can be bought for a price in the neighborhood of $1,000-$1,200. Since they’re smaller, they can be handheld, which allows you to maneuver quickly to capture birds in flight. You won’t get the kind of detail you can get out of the 600mm f/4L, but it’s much sharper than Canon’s 70-300mm f/4-5.6. There are three lenses I recommend, and which one is right for you will depend largely on your shooting preferences and abilities.
Canon EF 400mm f/5.6L. This is the lens I use for most of my wildlife photography. It’s extremely sharp, focuses nice and fast, and doesn’t give me a bit of trouble. It’s small enough to handhold (which is one advantage this lens has over larger, more expensive lenses), so you can get photos of moving subjects nicely. The biggest drawbacks to this lens are (1) it lacks image stabilization and (2) you have to be at least 11.5ft away from anything you want to photograph..
Canon EF 300mm f/4L IS. Many wildlife photographers swear by this lens, especially when adding a 1.4x tele-converter, which makes this effectively a 420mm f/5.6 IS (roughly equal to the 400mm lens above). This lens has the advantages of image stabilization and the ability to focus much closer. You only have to be about 5ft away with this lens. The drawback here is that by adding a tele-converter, the lens will be less sharp and focus a little more slowly.
Canon EF 100-300mm f/5.6L IS. I see many wildlife photographers using this lens. A zoom lens can be a real advantage, especially if you intend to use it for more than wildlife, and the addition of image stabilization gives it an advantage over the 400mm f/5.6L. The downside of this lens is that, being a zoom lens, it will not be quite as sharp as the other two lenses.
There no one right choice between these three lenses. The choice really depends on what’s most important to you. If you need IS, the 300mm and 100-400mm options are better. If you want lens speed and sharpness and don’t need IS as much, then the 400mm lens is probably better.
If you want to use the lens for close up photography as well, the 300mm will look much more attractive with the ability to focus at only 5 ft away. I should mention one important thing about image stabilization.IS only helps stabilize camera movement, not subject movement.
Wildlife tends to move, so even with IS, you often need faster shutter speeds to get sharp images of moving subjects. IS is a definite advantage, but the advantage is not as great when your subject is moving. It is the greatest help when shooting still subjects in low light hand held.
In other words, it’s important, but it’s not the only factor to consider when purchasing a lens.
You may also like:
Leave a Comment
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should wildlife hunting contests be permitted in Idaho? » [5877 Views]
- POLL: Should the ban on South Africa’s horn trade be lifted? » [3461 Views]
- POLL: Should whaling by Iceland and Norway be banned? » [2841 Views]
- POLL: Should New Zealand fur seals be culled in South Australia? » [1345 Views]
- The most beautiful crocodile photos we’ve ever seen » [1141 Views]
- POLL: Should the export of baby elephants to China be stopped? » [1136 Views]
- Crow Tries to Fight Eagle, Gets Free Ride Instead » [934 Views]
- Saving the dhole: The forgotten ‘badass’ Asian dog more endangered than tigers » [876 Views]
- Six fishy reasons why humans should steer well clear of the sea » [827 Views]
- POLL: Should whale hunting in Alaska be banned? » [754 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of giraffes be banned? » [10790 Views]
- » POLL: Should the ban on fox hunting be relaxed in the UK? [10726 Views]
- POLL: Should the Faroe Islands’ whale slaughter be allowed to continue? » [7572 Views]
- POLL: Should wildlife hunting contests be permitted in Idaho? » [7183 Views]
- POLL: Should bear hunting be banned in the US? » [4541 Views]
- POLL: Should lion canned hunting be banned in South Africa? » [4334 Views]
- Komodo and its Dragons » [4021 Views]
- POLL: Should the ban on South Africa’s horn trade be lifted? » [3462 Views]
- Poll: Should hunting of black bears in Florida be allowed? » [3261 Views]
- POLL: Should the wolf hunting contest in Idaho be stopped? » [3094 Views]