Central African states on Saturday said they would mobilize up to 1,000 soldiers and law-enforcement officials to immediately start joint military operations to protect the region’s last remaining savanna elephants, threatened by Sudanese poachers on a killing spree in the region.
On the night of March 14-15, in southern Chad, these poachers killed at least 89 elephants in one night. Since the beginning of the year, they also slaughtered at least thirty elephants in the Central African Republic. They are believed to be responsible for the 300 elephants killed in Cameroon’s Bouba N’Djida National Park in early 2012, forcing the country to mobilize 600 elite soldiers to defend the country’s borders from these poachers.
Although precise figures are difficult to come by, savanna elephant populations in, for example, the Central African Republic – the country with historically the highest numbers of savanna elephants in the region – are believed to have plummeted from around 80,000 thirty years ago to a few hundred today.
The emergency plan, estimated to cost around 1.8 million euros, calls for the use of aerial support, land vehicles, the purchase of satellite phones, the establishment of a joint military command including real-time information sharing and analysis systems, as well as for sending a diplomatic mission to Sudan and South Sudan – where the poachers are believed to originate from.
Although the statement said ECCAS states would fund these operations themselves, they called on the international community to “mobilize and make available complementary funds” to sustain these efforts now and in the future.
“This is fantastic news. ECCAS and its member states deserve to be congratulated for their determination to once and for all stop these elephant killers,” said Bas Huijbregts, head of the Central African strand of WWF’s campaign against illegal wildlife trade.
“Now, it is up to demand countries – principally China and Thailand – to show that they have as much courage and determination as these Central African countries,” he said.
In the statement, the ECCAS states congratulated Thailand for its March 3 decision to ban its legal domestic ivory trade, and urged it to implement this decision.
Ivory consumers “need to be sensitized to the consequences” of their demand for ivory, the statement said, adding that “destination countries (should) adopt measures to reduce ivory demand.”
Finally, the statement added that ECCAS states should work towards modifying national legislations so that poaching and ivory trade become offences “equivalent to other transnational crimes”, such as drug and small arms trafficking.
After the declaration, the United States ambassador to Cameroon, Robert Jackson, said he was “pleased with the meeting. The plan is a good one.”
“But execution is now critical. I am, however, concerned that there is no mention of corruption in the statement, because it contributes directly to the poaching and trafficking problem,” he said.
Nicolas Berlanga Martinez, the EU mission’s head of cooperation also congratulated ECCAS for its initiative, saying that “the measures adopted seem sufficiently ambitious to respond to the urgency of the situation, and I will remain attentive, along with other partners, of the implementation of this emergency plan.”
“I also salute the proposal to reinforce collaboration between the different ministries responsible for countering poaching and illegal wildlife trade, and would also urge these authorities to ensure a proper coordination of donations from its partners,” he added.
In the statement, the ECCAS states reaffirmed their commitment to protect its elephants, which they said “belong to the natural universal heritage of humanity”. “The international community stands by Central Africa,” Huijbregts, of WWF, said. “Now the region is in the world’s spotlight,” he concluded.
WWF is campaigning for greater protection of threatened species such as rhinos, tigers and elephants. In order to save endangered animals, source, transit and demand countries must all improve law enforcement, customs controls and judicial systems. WWF is also urging governments in consumer countries to undertake demand reduction efforts to curb the use of endangered species products.
This article was written and published by WWF Global.
You may also like:
Leave a Comment
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should wildlife hunting contests be permitted in Idaho? » [5877 Views]
- POLL: Should the ban on South Africa’s horn trade be lifted? » [3461 Views]
- POLL: Should whaling by Iceland and Norway be banned? » [2841 Views]
- POLL: Should New Zealand fur seals be culled in South Australia? » [1345 Views]
- The most beautiful crocodile photos we’ve ever seen » [1137 Views]
- POLL: Should the export of baby elephants to China be stopped? » [1136 Views]
- Crow Tries to Fight Eagle, Gets Free Ride Instead » [934 Views]
- Saving the dhole: The forgotten ‘badass’ Asian dog more endangered than tigers » [876 Views]
- Six fishy reasons why humans should steer well clear of the sea » [827 Views]
- POLL: Should whale hunting in Alaska be banned? » [754 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of giraffes be banned? » [10788 Views]
- » POLL: Should the ban on fox hunting be relaxed in the UK? [10726 Views]
- POLL: Should the Faroe Islands’ whale slaughter be allowed to continue? » [7572 Views]
- POLL: Should wildlife hunting contests be permitted in Idaho? » [7183 Views]
- POLL: Should bear hunting be banned in the US? » [4535 Views]
- POLL: Should lion canned hunting be banned in South Africa? » [4330 Views]
- Komodo and its Dragons » [4021 Views]
- POLL: Should the ban on South Africa’s horn trade be lifted? » [3462 Views]
- Poll: Should hunting of black bears in Florida be allowed? » [3261 Views]
- POLL: Should the wolf hunting contest in Idaho be stopped? » [3092 Views]