The announcement comes more than a year after China’s President Xi Jinping and United States President Barack Obama pledged to enact “nearly complete bans” on the import and export of ivory, an agreement Wildlife Watch reporter Rachael Bale described as “the most significant step yet in efforts to shut down an industry that has fueled the illegal hunting of elephants.”
It also follows a commitment made in October by the international community to close domestic ivory markets.
“This is the best New Year’s present I’ve ever had,” says Sue Lieberman, vice president of international policy for the Wildlife Conservation Society, a nonprofit based in New York City that works to help save elephants and other wildlife. “China is the world’s largest market, both of small ivory items and high-end, expensive ones.”
The global ivory trade has been banned since 1989, but during recent years large-scale poaching has resumed, and the African elephant population has dropped to as low as 415,000—a net decline of more than 110,000 from 2007. Advocates believe that legal domestic ivory markets perpetuate an illegal trade because older, pre-ban ivory can’t easily be distinguished from poached ivory.
The U.S., also a significant market for elephant ivory, held up its end of the agreement with China in June when it enacted a near-total ban on the commercial trade of African elephant ivory. The new rules further limited exports and sales across state lines and restricted a hunter’s allowable ivory trophy imports to no more than two a year.
China, meanwhile, has spent the past year exploring how to implement such a ban. The country convened a group of researchers from several disciplines to assess options and make recommendations to the government.
China now has 34 ivory manufacturers and 130 licensed retail shops that sell ivory, Wei Ji, an independent wildlife researcher, told the Guardian earlier this month. According to today’s announcement, China will revoke some licenses by March 2017 and eventually stop all commercial ivory carving and retail sales by the end of the year. The plan to phase out the ivory trade also encourages ivory carvers to begin using other materials.
China’s announcement is especially significant because Beijing controls—and has actively encouraged—its domestic ivory trade.
In 2008 the country successfully lobbied the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), the body that sets global wildlife trade policy, to allow it to buy a limited amount of ivory to sell in a tightly controlled market within its borders. About that time it also built the world’s largest ivory-carving factory and began opening shops to sell ivory. To further legitimize the industry, the government even added ivory carving to its official register of Intangible Cultural Heritage.
But this legal Chinese ivory trade provided a springboard for illegal trading, as Wildlife Watch reported last year:
National Geographic went inside some of China’s carving factories in 2012 and revealed how China’s actions were promoting the legal and illegal ivory trade. Instead of keeping prices for ivory low, the government raised them, making ivory more profitable to poachers.
Meanwhile, Beijing’s plan to assign legally carved ivory products photo IDs backfired—the photos are so small that an ID used to identify a legal piece of ivory can easily be attached to an illegal one to legitimize it. The photos are so small that it’s hard to tell whether the piece in the photo is the same one being sold.
Today’s landmark declaration follows a pledge made by the Hong Kong government last week to phase out its domestic ivory market by 2021. Hong Kong is the world’s biggest legal retail market for elephant ivory and a major transit hub for illegal ivory, much of which goes to mainland China.
Lieberman says she hopes China’s one-year time line for phasing out its ivory market will spur Hong Kong to shut down its market more quickly. She adds that Japan and the European Union next need to crack down on their legal ivory trades, which conservationists say are helping fuel poaching.
“The only way to save elephants is for everyone to close their markets,” she says.
This article was first published by National Geographic on 30 Dec 2016.
Share on social media:
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should Finland’s 235 wolves be culled? [1641 Views]
- POLL: Should the Wildlife Trust’s campaign to slaughter grey squirrels be stopped? [1607 Views]
- POLL: Should all tiger farms in China be closed down? [1604 Views]
- POLL: Should Trump disband USDA Wildlife “Killing” Services? [1181 Views]
- POLL: Should more bear hunting licenses be issued? [1152 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [1038 Views]
- POLL: Should Australia’s feral cats be culled? [822 Views]
- POLL: Could U.S. endangered species rules go extinct under Trump? [726 Views]
- Why do birds sing? [634 Views]
- An elk’s-eye view of migrating through Yellowstone [567 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- White Killer Whale Adult Spotted for First Time in Wild [42055 Views]
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farms? [16796 Views]
- POLL: Should fur farming be banned in the European Union? [13849 Views]
- POLL: Should Congress disband Wildlife “Killing” Services? [11117 Views]
- POLL: Should driven grouse-shooting be banned? [8614 Views]
- POLL: Should grouse shooting on highland estates be banned? [8309 Views]
- POLL: Should the annual Canadian seal hunt be banned? [8120 Views]
- POLL: Should black bears be killed for Royal Guards’ fur caps? [8048 Views]
- POLL: Should China’s dog meat festival be banned? [7416 Views]
- Wildlife Photo Adventure in Costa Rica! [6115 Views]