Quantcast
Jan 092012
 

Birds and planes don’t mix, as was demonstrated strikingly three years ago when Canada geese were sucked into both engines of a USAir flight from LaGuardia, forcing the plane into the Hudson River. But it turns out that a more benign interaction, using ultralight planes to teach endangered whooping cranes their migration route, has its complications, too.

A pilot guiding cranes on an Operation Migration flight in 2006 - Photo Associated Press

For 11 years, conservationists have used ultralights to guide the birds from Michigan to Florida. The birds are essentially orphans, raised in captivity without parents, but if they can be shown the 1,200-mile route once, they will find their way back to Michigan the following fall on their own, and fly unescorted for the rest of their lives.

The idea is a bit weird; the pilots dress up to look like birds so the fledglings will be “imprinted” with them. But everybody seems to like it; this year’s trip is underwritten in part by Southern Company, the big utility.

But now it turns out that some of these do-gooder flights face a legal challenge.

The Federal Aviation Administration classifies the ultralights as “light sport aircraft,” a category with simplified licensing rules. Such aircraft can carry only one or two people, cannot fly in congested areas and cannot fly for hire, among other restrictions.

The question is, are the pilots flying for hire?

David Sakrison, a member of the board of directors of Operation Migration and a spokesman for the group, said that it owns three ultralights. There are three pilots, all employees of the group, and nearly all of their work was on the ground, he added. The birds fly only an hour or two a day, not every day, and the pilots are volunteering their time in the air, he said.

The Flight Standards District Office in Minneapolis, an enforcement office of the Federal Aviation Administration, always accepted that explanation, he said, until last year, when two complaints were lodged.

A spokesman for the F.A.A., Lynn Lunsford, said his agency had to investigate once the complaints had been received. If it determines that this is work for hire, he said, the pilots would need commercial licenses. And no ultralights have been approved thus far as commercial aircraft, he said.

The agency is considering whether it could grant an exemption but does not know how long this process would take, he said.

While the F.A.A. sorts this out, Operation Migration said in a blog post, the birds are being safely kept in a pen in Franklin County, Ala. Precise timing is not critical, Mr. Sakrison said; the trip usually takes about two and a half months.

The birds only fly in the morning, in calm air, covering 25 to 50 miles on the days that they fly, when weather allows.

But if the dispute goes on long enough, Operation Migration may end up trucking the birds to Florida. They are still about 500 miles short of their wintering grounds.

While this particular migration program has not had any safety problems, Mr. Sakrison said, a similar one has, with the cranes getting tangled in the ultralights.

As Mr. Lunsford put it, “Birds are the last ones to follow air traffic restrictions.”

He said that Operation Migration had halted its operations “once we informed them of the potential issues.”

“We’re working to see if there’s a way they can continue with what they’re doing,” he said, adding, “We’re not holding them to any different standard than we would any other pilot.”

Here’s a video of an early-morning takeoff of an Operation Migration flight:

This post was written by Matthew L. Wald and published in the New York Times.


Leave a Comment

  One Response to “Legal Problem Grounds a Bird Migration”

  1. This is so cool! I linked to your page from my Pintrest account, to share it with others. I hope that things work out for the best. Thanks for sharing.

 Leave a Reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>



Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days

  1. POLL: Should the trophy hunting of giraffes be banned? » [1093 Views]
  2. Tiger family photo surprises scientists » [952 Views]
  3. Poll: Do you agree that shooting pheasants is good for the countryside? » [780 Views]
  4. POLL: Should the kill quota on cougars be increased in New Mexico? » [774 Views]
  5. Poll: Should UK towns and cities be allowed to clip seagulls’ wings? » [717 Views]
  6. Extreme birdwatching: Twitching in war zones » [663 Views]
  7. Blue-Bearded Helmetcrest Rediscovered in Colombia, Photographed for First Time » [521 Views]
  8. POLL: Should spring hunting on Malta be stopped? » [457 Views]
  9. Rembrandt’s monkey: good news for Africa’s newest primate » [456 Views]
  10. Peregrine falcon found shot dead at Derbyshire Wildlife Trust’s headquarters » [448 Views]

Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months

  1. » POLL: Should the ban on fox hunting be relaxed in the UK? [10680 Views]
  2. Petition: Stop Lion Canned Hunting in South Africa – Shocking Video » [4158 Views]
  3. POLL: Should the trophy hunting of giraffes be banned? » [3690 Views]
  4. POLL: Should lion canned hunting be banned in South Africa? » [3655 Views]
  5. Komodo and its Dragons » [3654 Views]
  6. POLL: Should bear hunting be banned in the US? » [3429 Views]
  7. Poll: Should hunting of black bears in Florida be allowed? » [2964 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the slaughter of wolves in British Columbia be banned? » [2936 Views]
  9. Join the 1st World Giraffe Day and help save these gentle giants » [2871 Views]
  10. POLL: Should the wolf hunting contest in Idaho be stopped? » [2677 Views]