The past two years have been tough going for the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society.
A big part of its mission since 2005 has been to intercept and stop Japanese ships from hunting whales. Every such outing costs Sea Shepherd about $4 million. In the years when they found success and actually foiled Japan’s whalers, that investment was well worth it. Today, though, Japan is routinely one step ahead of them.
“Every time we approached them, they would be just over the horizon,” Sea Shepherd’s founder, Captain Paul Watson, told The Washington Post. “They knew where we were at every moment. We’re literally wasting our time and our money.”
Why? Because Japan now uses military-quality surveillance equipment to monitor the Sea Shepherd vessels. This allows Japanese whalers to always know in real time where the Sea Shepherd ships are. There’s no opportunity anymore for the organization’s ships to actually intercept Japanese operations and save the whales being targeted.
Since 1986, there’s been a moratorium on whaling instituted by the International Whaling Commission (IWC). Japan is a signatory to the IWC, but it ignores this moratorium by creating a feeble fiction. Every year, it says the whales it kills are taken in the name of “research.” That word is even stenciled on their vessels.
Japan says once its “research” is done, it must not waste the by-products that come from the whales. This is why whale meat ends up in restaurants and school lunches all over Japan. They’re not just out there brazenly hunting whales for the profit it brings, they say. No one really believes this assertion, of course.
The International Court of Justice temporarily stopped Japan’s whaling in 2014, finding that it simply was not done for scientific purposes. Japan stopped whaling for a year, then picked it right back up again in 2016 and 2017. Up to now, Sea Shepherd’s success in preventing whale deaths by Japanese poachers has been impressive.
In a news release, the organization highlighted some of those achievements:
Sea Shepherd was relentless in reducing [Japan’s] yearly quotas significantly and in 2012/2013 the Japanese whalers went home with only about 10% of their intended kills. We did this at the same time the U.S. Federal Court put significant legal obstacles in our path.
The results speak for themselves. Over 6,000 whales saved. Not a single endangered Humpback killed and only 10 endangered Fin whales killed in a decade where 500 were slated to die. In addition, the Japanese whalers lost tens of millions of dollars.
Sadly, in March 2017, Japanese whalers returned after a four month expedition with 333 dead minke whales. In part, that’s because Sea Shepherd has been unable to stop them as effectively as they once could.
The non-profit is therefore stepping back after 12 years of whale wars to regroup. It needs to figure out how best to proceed in light of this new and difficult obstacle. However, Captain Watson vows his fight is not over.
There are those who love what the Sea Shepherd does, and those who decry it as too aggressive and violent. However, when no other entity or country seems inclined to take Japan on, what are these conservationists to do? Watch the whales die as the world ignores Japan’s flouting of international law?
There are no easy answers, but Watson and his Sea Shepherd colleagues know where they stand.
“Sea Shepherd’s continuing efforts to go after and shut down whalers will continue, and not only against Japanese whaling, but also against Norwegian, Danish, and Icelandic whaling,” said the group in a news release. “This is what we have been doing for forty years. We will never quit until the abomination of whaling is abolished forever by anyone, anywhere, for any reason.”
This article was first published by Care2.com on 05 Sep 2017.
We invite you to share your opinion whether Japan should be sanctioned for continuing to slaughter whales? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.
Thank you for voting.
Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.
Share this post with your friends
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should the tradition of throwing wild turkeys from a plane be allowed? – [1931 Views]
- POLL: Should the Rare Spirit Bear Be Protected From Hunters? – [1652 Views]
- POLL: Should Arizona’s wild cats be protected from trophy hunters? – [1315 Views]
- POLL: Should the use of bears as living tourist attractions be banned? – [1205 Views]
- POLL: Should Dolphinariums As Tourist Attractions Be Closed Down? – [1071 Views]
- POLL: Should animal traps in our National Wildlife Refuges be banned? – [1065 Views]
- POLL: Should Orcas and Dolphins be freed from all Seaquariums? – [1033 Views]
- POLL: Should the Alaska Refuge be opened up for drilling? – [992 Views]
- POLL: Should the testing of cosmetics on animals be banned? – [897 Views]
- POLL: Should Trump’s elephant trophy hunting plan be stopped? – [827 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should hunting with hounds be banned? – [7645 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [6594 Views]
- POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3799 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of bears and wolves be banned? – [3788 Views]
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farming? – [3605 Views]
- POLL: Should the slaughter of badgers in the UK be finally stopped? – [3055 Views]
- POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2873 Views]
- POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2667 Views]
- POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2578 Views]
- POLL: Should wild elephants be sold to Chinese zoos? [2322 Views]