Revealing scientific reports about the complexity of strategies employed by poachers and a cross-border trade scheme in the north African countries of Morocco, Tunisia and Algeria show that these activities have contributed to serious shrinkage of specie range of the beautiful European goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis), which is often targeted by hunters.
On 22 June 2017, BirdLife International experts joined more than 80 people representing governments, civil society organisations the convention on migratory species and a network of experts working to stop illegal killing, trapping and trade in wild birds met for two days in Sliema, the Republic of Malta, to press for the eradication of these threats which have been termed Illegal Killing, Taking and Trade of Migratory Wild Birds (IKB).
The Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) and African-Eurasian Migratory Landbirds Action Plan (AEMLAP) identifies taking and trade of migratory landbirds in the flyway as one of the main threats in the region.
“Man must continually evaluate his existing relationship with nature. There are many changes that have taken place within our environment and the human behaviour such as birds hunting must also change for nature to continue supporting human life,” stressed Dr. Olivier Biber, member of the AEMLAP working group, who participated in the meeting.
During the meeting, participants discussed a review by Birdlife International, on the IKB concern in the Mediterranean that was published in 2016 and acknowledged that the results from the review have catalysed government efforts either directly or indirectly to address this problem, which also affects many migratory landbirds. BirdLife also presented preliminary results for European IKB review, and indicated that a similar review is being undertaken for Iran, Iraq and the Arabian Peninsula.
As commitment to end this problem, participants agreed to have a scoreboard as a tool that governments would use to assess and grade progress of all European and Mediterranean countries towards ending illegal killing, taking and trade of migratory wild birds. A revised version of this scoreboard would be produced ahead of a CMS scientific council meeting in the German city of Bonn from 10 to 13 July. It shall also be presented for noting or adoption at the 12th CMS Conference of Parties, scheduled for 22 to 28 October 2017, in Manila, Philippines.
Apart from using the scoreboard as a supportive tool to allow governments to assess the results of their efforts in addressing the IKB problem, it was also unanimously agreed that welcoming other stakeholders to populate this tool would be a more participatory approach that adds value to it.
The Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) responded by forming an Intergovernmental Task Force on Illegal Killing, Taking and Trade of Migratory Birds in the Mediterranean (MIKT) region. Several governments have also developed national strategies or action plans to tackle the problem at country level.
This outcome gave optimism that continued push by the governments and stakeholders will yield important results beneficial to AEMLAP species many of which are heavily affected by the IKB.
This meeting was hosted and chaired by the Maltese government, with Lebanon as the vice Chair and was attended by over 80 participants from 24 countries in Europe, 17 of which are EU member states and the Mediterranean, European Commission, 29 observer organisations that included NGOs, enforcement groups and networks and scientific organisations.
This article was first published by BirdLife International on 07 Jul 2017.
We invite you to share your opinion whether the killing and trading of migratory birds should be banned? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.
Thank you for voting.
Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.
Share on social media:
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2804 Views]
- POLL: Should South Africa’s canned hunting industry be banned? [1888 Views]
- POLL: Should Mozambique’s wildlife park be funded by trophy hunting? [1392 Views]
- POLL: Should the use of elephants for “entertainment” be banned? [1270 Views]
- POLL: Should Asia’s elephant tourism be banned? [1039 Views]
- POLL: Should the use of wild animals in circuses be banned? [942 Views]
- Bald Eagle Adopts Baby Hawk Instead of Eating Him [911 Views]
- POLL: Should wildlife-killing “cyanide bombs” be banned? [897 Views]
- POLL: Should Yellowstone Grizzlies be removed from the Endangered List? [863 Views]
- POLL: Should the owning of exotic pets be banned? [745 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farms? [16900 Views]
- POLL: Should Congress disband Wildlife “Killing” Services? [11095 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [10080 Views]
- POLL: Should driven grouse-shooting be banned? [8690 Views]
- POLL: Should grouse shooting on highland estates be banned? [8232 Views]
- POLL: Should the killing of giraffes be outlawed? [4712 Views]
- POLL: Should the sale of elephant ivory be legalized? [4081 Views]
- POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3773 Views]
- POLL: Should the coyote continue to be exterminated? [3448 Views]
- POLL: Should the use of snares be banned in the UK? [2609 Views]