In a win for animals, online travel agency company Responsible Travel has pledged to stop promoting zoos. The company will instead be working to support better ways for consumers to learn about and appreciate wildlife.
Facilities that keep animals in captivity have continued to use education and conservation as major justifications for continuing the practice, but it’s becoming increasingly clear that those arguments don’t hold up.
In a statement, the company said that while they and their users value wildlife and conservation efforts (its wildlife-related vacation sales have gone up 25 percent over just the past two years), they believethat animals should not be held in captivity.
Responsible Travel made the announcement with the support of Born Free Foundation and actress Joanna Lumley.
According to Responsible Travel, there is plenty of evidence to support the inhumane nature of keeping wild animals captive, there are better ways to educate people without captivity.
While some zoos do fund good conservation work, so little funding from zoos is being allocated toward it that it’s essentially not worth supporting when there are more effective alternatives.
As for endangered species that zoos continue to claim they’re helping save, a vast majority of species kept by zoos are not actually endangered, and even for those who are, most captive breeding programs don’t involve returning any of them to the wild.
“We believe tourism plays a role in funding conservation, and crucially, in ensuring local people and governments benefit sufficiently to make conservation viable. Zoos are not appropriate in 2017. They are relics of the past, and the arguments to justify keeping animals in captivity no longer stand up. The sad reality is that the animals are held captive primarily for our entertainment not for reasons of conservation and it is time that this stopped,” said Responsible Travel CEO Justin Francis.
Responsible Travel, which works with 375 tour operators around the world, has since removed any tours that include visits to zoos from its site and is now researching other types of facilities to promote, including rescue and rehabilitation centers that are caring for non-releasable animals, along wildlife conservancies and parks that don’t participate in captive breeding programs and endangered species conservation centers.
The change represents a major shift in attitudes about keeping animals in captivity, and while other tourism-related companies including Virgin Holidays and TripAdviser have taken stands against some harmful activities, this marks the first time a company has taken a stand against zoos.
“The world is changing. Things that seemed impossible only a short time ago are now within reach. In my lifetime, a global shift in public consciousness, a movement, may see – if not an end – a massive reduction in the exploitation of wild animals in their millions in thousands of zoos worldwide,” said Will Travers OBE, President of Born Free.
Hopefully this will help set a standard and other tour operators will adopt Responsible Travel’s stance that “zoos are outdated, unethical and unnecessary,” and more people will seek out other kinds of opportunities to engage with wildlife and our environment.
This article was first published by Care2.com on 09 Apr 2017.
We invite you to share your opinion whether travel companies should stop supporting zoos? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.
Thank you for voting.
Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.
Share this post with your friends
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should Trump’s elephant trophy hunting plan be stopped? – [1177 Views]
- POLL: Should Dolphinariums As Tourist Attractions Be Closed Down? – [1111 Views]
- POLL: Should big-game and canned, trophy hunting be banned? – [1015 Views]
- POLL: Should babies be allowed to buy hunting licenses? – [941 Views]
- POLL: Should wild horses be protected from roundups and slaughter? – [889 Views]
- POLL: Should Wildlife Services stop its secret wildlife-killing program? – [823 Views]
- POLL: Should South Africa strictly enforce its anti-poaching legislation? – [811 Views]
- Florida Opened a Fake Alligator Farm to Catch Poachers – [806 Views]
- POLL: Should African Grey Parrots be protected from illegal trafficking? – [786 Views]
- POLL: Should gillnets be banned in the Upper Gulf to save the Vaquita? – [778 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should hunting with hounds be banned? – [7663 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [5926 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of bears and wolves be banned? – [3810 Views]
- POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3799 Views]
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farming? – [3648 Views]
- POLL: Should the slaughter of badgers in the UK be finally stopped? – [3065 Views]
- POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2873 Views]
- POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2667 Views]
- POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2578 Views]
- POLL: Should wild elephants be sold to Chinese zoos? [2322 Views]