POLL: Should all wolves be stripped of federal protection?

POLL: Should all wolves be stripped of federal protection?

  • 213

In an incredibly disappointing, but not entirely surprising move, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has announced its intention to strip gray of federal protection in the lower 48, which their advocates fear will be a death sentence for them.

Gray wolves have already faced such heavy persecution that we nearly killed every single one of them by the 1900s with bounty programs, and . Protection that was put in place with the passage of the Act (ESA) in the 1970s finally helped put them back on the path to recovery, but their journey is far from over and they’re still functionally extinct in vast portions of their historic range.

Red Wolves are seen at the North Carolina Museum of Life & Science in Durham, North Carolina. Photograph: Salwan Georges/The Washington Post/Getty Images


Now, despite not having a plan in place to ensure their continued survival (which the government is currently facing a lawsuit over), David Bernhardt, the acting secretary of the Interior Department, announced a proposal to strip federal protection from all wolves in the lower 48 – with the exception of Mexican wolves.

Doing so would hand management responsibilities over to states that have already proven to be hostile to recovery efforts – opening the door to rampant hunting and trapping. Overall, it will hinder recovery efforts and all but ensure wolves never expand to portions of their historic range where it’s been determined there’s plenty of suitable habitat for them, including the Adirondacks, southern Rockies and other areas.

Gavin Shire, a spokesman for the FWS, said in a statement to the AP, “Recovery of the under the Endangered Species Act is one of our nation’s great conservation successes, with the wolf joining other cherished species, such as the bald eagle, that have been brought back from the brink. ”

Despite what the FWS says, multiple conservation and advocacy organizations disagree, and argue that gray wolves are still far from recovered, and this move will push them back to the brink. They’re speaking out in opposition to the proposal, along with vowing to take action to ensure gray wolves aren’t delisted.

“This disgusting proposal would be a death sentence for gray wolves across the country,” said Collette Adkins, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “The administration is dead set on appeasing special interests that want to kill wolves. We’re working hard to stop them.”


You can speak up against the Trump Administration’s war on wolves by signing and sharing the petition asking the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to keep them federally protected.

This article was first published by Care2.com on 11 Mar 2019.

We invite you to share your opinion whether all wolves should be stripped of federal protection? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should all wolves be stripped of federal protection?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop . By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.


Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter


Vanished - Megascops Choliba by Jose Garcia Allievi

Discover hidden wildlife with our FREE newsletters

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.


Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 213

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
george mira

Just about every state where Federal protections have been removed, and in several where they remain in effect, indulges in direct or indirect killing of wolves. From Missouri, Iowa, Utah, Illinois, Indiana, “sport hunters” have murdered wolves with no or little consequences, claiming mistakes or not knowing what they shot. This issue also shows that gun ownership and nonessential hunting are in extreme need of extreme restriction. In Washington and Oregon, lethal response to wolves preying on as few as 3 or 4 livestock or other domestics, is met with execution. Humans across the US west have so occupied and… Read more »



Moose Martin
Moose Martin

There is no logic behind murdering our wildlife. The joy for them is the act of killing something.


Rhetorical question. Quick answer: NO!!!


No wildlife should be stripped from Federal Protection. In 15 years or less every wild animal will be extinct due to all the GROWING number of humans that love killing.

Tamara Miller
Tamara Miller

No wildlife should be stripped from Federal Protection. In 15 years or less every wild animal will be extinct due to all the GROWING number of humans that love killing.

Karen Lyons Kalmenson

A world without wolves, isn’t