POLL: Should the Biden Administration reinstate the gray wolf on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife?

POLL: Should the Biden Administration reinstate the gray wolf on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife?

  • 314
    Shares


When Joe Biden entered the White House on his first day as President of the United States, he signed 17 executive actions and orders — many of which review or reverse environmental policy written under President Donald .

In a fact sheet released Tuesday to the heads of relevant agencies, titled “President-elect Biden’s Day One Executive Actions Deliver Relief for Families Across America Amid Converging Crises,” the administration pledged to examine or instate changes regarding union jobs, advancing environmental justice and combatting .

“These actions are rooted in the rightful recognition of the fact that our planet, our lands, our air, our water, and our communities do not belong to corporations, lobbyists, or government institutions–they belong to us, the people, and protecting them is essential,” Sierra Club Legislative Director Melinda Pierce said Wednesday.

“President-elect Biden took historic action on day one to advance his agenda — including signing 15 executive actions and asking agencies to take steps in an additional two areas,” incoming White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki wrote in a statement. “This compares to two day one executive actions from Biden’s four predecessors in the White House combined.”

Among the list of agency actions to be looked at are two controversial rules that loosened restrictions for America’s  and farmers — one removing the gray wolf from the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and the other removing 2015 regulatory provisions that prohibited certain sport practices “otherwise permitted by the State of Alaska” in its 10 national preserves.

Though legal under state law, critics and conservationists said the revised June 2020 “Alaska; Hunting and Trapping in National Preserves” rule was cruel to wildlife.

However, the National Park Service said the rule was supported by tribal leaders and hunting and outdoors groups and that it had “reconsidered its prior position.”

They had initially determined that the practices conflicted with the federal mission to protect Alaska’s wildlife.

Conservationists asserted the real aim was to reduce the population of wolves and other predators and increase the numbers of game animals.

Five months later, the administration and would revoke Act protections for in most of the country.

“We are taking this action because the best available scientific and commercial data available establish that the entities in the lower 48 United States do not meet the definitions of a threatened species or an endangered species under the Act,” they wrote on the Federal Register.

Although gray wolves — now recovered from near extinction — are revered by many, farmers and hunters welcomed the U.S. Department of the Interior’s decision.

Farmers say reducing wolf numbers would help keep their livestock safe from now-routine attacks. They had previously faced a felony if they had tried to kill the wolves to protect their animals.

The wolves, listed as an endangered species in 1978 and as a “threatened” species in Minnesota, would continue to be monitored for five years under the rule. More than 2,000 now occupy six states in the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rockies.

Wolves have never been legally protected in Alaska, according to The Associated Press.

The U.S. Department of the Interior told Fox News it is unable to speculate on the incoming administration’s actions.

Fox News has reached out to the National Parks Service, Alaska’s Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy and the Biden transition team for further comment but did not immediately receive a response.

This article was first published by Fox News on 21 January 2021. 


We invite you to share your opinion whether the should reinstate the gray wolf on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should the Biden Administration reinstate the gray wolf on the List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.


Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.


What you can do

Support ‘Fighting for Wildlife’ by donating as little as $1 – It only takes a minute. Thank you.

 

 

Fighting for Wildlife supports approved wildlife conservation organizations, which spend at least 80 percent of the money they raise on actual fieldwork, rather than administration and fundraising. When making a donation you can designate for which type of initiative it should be used – wildlife, oceans, forests or climate.

 

close
Vanished - Megascops Choliba by Jose Garcia Allievi

Discover hidden wildlife with our FREE newsletters

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 314
    Shares




Facebook Comments

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
george mira

Without immediate relisting, Idaho, Montana, Wisconsin will kill hundreds this year alone.They will sink back toward extinction with no more alive to disperse to Colorado, California, western Oregon, western Washington, even though Mt St Helens , Cascades, and coastal ranges are in dire need of wolves to keep elk herds healthy, from Wyoming to the west coast of WA, OR, CA. Utah already has evil laws preventing wolves from return, as does South Dakota. Alberta and BS contunue to kill wolves , as does Alaska. I gave $1k to Raincoast Conservancy to buy up hunting right to Spirit Bear rainforest… Read more »

Karen Lyons Kalmenson

As long as the human animal plods carelessly across the earth landscape, all species, including his own, are endangered