POLL: Should the slaughter of grouse on the “Glorious Twelfth” be banned?

  • 358
    Shares


With a the start of the - season on the “Glorious Twelfth”, animal rights groups have a new target in their sights – the Ministry of Defence.

The government department is one of many public bodies that are coming under pressure to ban the shooting of birds for sport on their land.

The (LACS) has commissioned a poll which it says shows overwhelming public support for a ban. But the Game and Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT), which promotes “game and wildlife management as an essential part of nature conservation”, says the countryside would suffer and jobs would be lost as a result.

A ban on the shooting of birds, such as grouse, , and waterfowl on publicly-owned land would have limited impact as most shoots take place on private estates. But it would still dismay the shooting fraternity, which fears it could presage further restrictions on their sport.

An estimated 100,000 birds a day are shot for sport during the season. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

According to the LACS, there are 198 shooting licences on UK land classed as publicly owned. These include 18 tracts of land owned by local authorities, three in national parks and 174 sites overseen by quangos such as the Environment Agency.

Most are for shooting of pheasant or waterfowl. But documents released under the Freedom of Information Act reveal that the MoD has issued licences for grouse shoots at the army’s Catterick garrison and RAF Fylingdales in North Yorkshire and the Warcop training area in Cumbria.

Grouse shooting is particularly contentious, as the birds are wild and raised on moorland by gamekeepers who trap and snare to keep predator numbers down, and burn vegetation to create the birds’ ideal environment.

“There is no good way to manage moorland for grouse shooting, it can only be done through purging native wildlife by trap, snare and gun, and burning away precious habitat, all at the expense of our country’s rich natural heritage,” said Chris Luffingham, the LACS’s director of campaigns. “It is ironic that, while the MoD is training courageous personnel to conserve wildlife in Africa, it is leasing public moorland for grouse shooting here in the UK. British wildlife and habitat must be taken out of the firing lineby the MoD.”

An MoD spokesman said: “Grouse shooting does not damage the environment on MoD land. Licences are only granted after careful assessments of the health of the grouse population and the surrounding environment. Any licences issued are only for a small number of days a year.”

The GWCT claims shoots can improve the natural environment. In a submission outlining its reasons for opposing a public land ban it claims: “The key to seeing the conservation benefits from shoot management is in responsibility and sustainability. Where shoots are well managed and responsibly run according to best practice, environmental damage is avoided and there are wider conservation gains.”

An estimated 100,000 birds a day are shot for sport over the season, of which the majority are pheasants raised in captivity. According to a report commissioned by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs: “The UK rears approximately 20-30 million pheasants and three to six million red-legged partridges per annum for shooting purposes. Around half of these birds are imported as eggs or chicks from Europe.”

Natural Resources Wales is looking to implement a shooting ban on public land, as ordered by the Welsh assembly environment minister Hannah Blythyn.

“It is a great shame that the minister chose to disregard the evidence which shows that shooting delivers on the Environment (Wales) Act and the Well-Being of Future Generations Act without any real evidence that the wider public have strong views on the matter” said Sue Evans, director of the GWCT Wales.

However, a poll conducted by YouGov on behalf of Animal Aid and the LACS, suggests that 69% of people think shooting birds for sport should be illegal.

This article was first published by The Guardian on 05 Aug 2018.


We invite you to share your opinion whether the of grouse on the “Glorious Twelfth” should be banned? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should the slaughter of grouse on the "Glorious Twelfth" be banned?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.


Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop . By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 358
    Shares


Facebook Comments

9
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
Anna Volmer

ALL SLAUGHTER NEEDS TO BE BANNED. COW SLAUGHTER, CHICKEN SLAUGHTER, PIG SLAUGHTER, DOG SLAUGHTER, it doesn’t matter who is being slaughtered, it is never okay and needs to be banned.

Rose La Cour

Banned!

Agnes Kedmenecz

Stephanie Landry

Stephanie Landry

I think there’s a very easily attainable middle ground. It’s necessary for management, thanks to human encroachment; and it serves as a natural way for people to harvest food – hunting – an activity that has been around since, well, the start of life. All things have to eat. However, it can be managed with lower limits for better sustainability. There wouldn’t need to be farm raised pheasants released for harvest if there was a strong population being managed properly. But hey, that’s the struggle for all developing countries – finding a balance between humans and wildlife.

Lois Carol Wessels

Shared on my timeline – please vote!!

Tonia Vassila

Absolutely banned

Ross McMahon

Ban the RSPB culling fox, deer, geese smashing gulls eggs first in my view as the lie to the Disney generation to fund the stalkers they pay £18000 per 6 months to do there wet work. But hey then think on idiots if the countries largest conservation organisation hunts shoots to maintain a balance and supported in there actions by there vice chairman Chis Packam either there lying to you as to what the country side needs or all the keepers are right? Well both the same thing really

John Edwards

Ross McMahon If they REALLY cared about wildlife they would welcome Grouse moors with open arms ! I bet not one voter has been near a managed moor ! https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/30/scientists-laud-biodiversity-renowned-grouse-moor-recording/

Ross McMahon

John Edwards difficult to be on a grouse moor when you spend all your time in a man made urban environment lol