POLL: Should the trade of polar bear parts be banned?

  • 396
    Shares


The US government has quietly dropped its campaign for an international ban in the trade of parts, which would have given the practice the same outlaw status as the elephant ivory market.

The US Fish and Wildlife Service has spent several years attempting to ban the overseas trade of polar bear skins, teeth, paws and other parts from Canada, which permits the hunting of the Arctic predators.

However, the federal agency has said it won’t pursue the matter further at an international summit of the Convention on International Trade in of Wild Fauna and Flora (Cites), in September. Instead, the US will focus on the threat posed to polar bears from .

The parts from more than 400 polar bears, considered an species, were traded in 2013. Photograph: Brian Battaile/AP

“Though we remain concerned about the commercial use of polar bear hides as an additional threat to the species, we are not pursuing increased Cites protections at this time,” the USFWS said in a statement.

“We are putting our resources into working in collaboration with other polar bear range states to address climate change and mitigate its impacts on the polar bear as the overwhelming threat to the long-term future of the species.”

The US’s bid to ban the polar bear trade has garnered support from the UK, Germany and Russia but has been opposed by Canada, which insists that hunting is sustainable and an important cultural practice of the native Inuit people. Hunting can also generate income for communities, with tourists paying up to $50,000 for the chance to shoot a polar bear.

The parts from more than 400 polar bears were traded in 2013. Polar bears are the world’s largest species of bear, with males weighing around 500kg (1,100lb).

About 16,000 of the world’s 25,000 polar bears live in Canada. Inuit would have been banned from selling paws and teeth of polar bears internationally, even after the rest of the animal had been butchered and eaten, under any Cites ban. The Canadian government has previously lobbied the US to drop its opposition to the trade.

Natan Obed, head of the national Inuit group Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, said: “This is a very good thing for Inuit. It’s great to see that other countries are taking a step back and respecting science on the issue rather than other interests that have more to do with people’s perception.”

However, environmental groups have strongly supported a ban, warning that hunting polar bears is putting further pressure on a species that is already on the frontline of climate change. The National Resources Defense Council said climate change, hunting and oil drilling is “driving the world’s polar bears to the brink of extinction”.

The US government has protected the polar bear as an endangered species and recently saw off a court challenge that would have opened up prime polar bear habitat for fossil fuel exploitation in Alaska.

Scientists have warned that there is “high probability” that polar bears will suffer a 30% slump in numbers by 2050 due to climate change. The species is suffering from the melting of Arctic ice, which makes it difficult for the animals to hunt for prey such as seals.

A recent study showed that the world’s southernmost polar bears have experienced significant weight loss since the 1980s due melting ice, with males dropping, on average by 45kg (99lb) and females by 31kg.

This article was first published by The Guardian on 04 May 2016.


We invite you to share your opinion whether the trade of polar bear parts should be banned? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page:

Should the trade of polar bear parts be banned?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

 

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 396
    Shares


Facebook Comments

8
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
Liz Cook

Sorry Inuit, but there is no hope in the long run for wildlife on a planet with 7 billion people and counting, so long as even a small percent of them want a trinket. Perpetuating the perception that that is alright is what is harmful. Terribly, terribly harmful.

Elsa Byleveldt

Dum question. Do the wright thing for a change.

Gemie Tortue

OUI VOTER OUI

Linda French

This is a friggin disaster! I am Canadian and have been fighting our gov't to stop the Polar Bear Hunt.Important culture practice "hogwash". The Inuit are the group that counts and report how many Polar Bears are in the area. Of course they will inflate that count, to their benefit! I agree that Inuit need suport in the community but this can be done by the government with food pricing, and funds to the community. Do not beleive for a minute that the Inuit do not over count the Polar Bear so that it comes up sustainable. This is like… Read more »

Leigh Lofgren

Another question that is obvious in it's answer. Should not be allowed or even started in the first place. Totally appalled and horrified that this is being done and must be stopped.

Dawn Adams

All trades of all animals and animals part should be stopped!

Theresa Kemp

If the US wants to do something they do it, morals, conscience, compassion ignored. They seem unable to look at the bigger picture and turn away from doing the right thing.

Michele Jankelow

I am continually amazed and appalled at the US government who conveniently ignore wildlife in the interests of their voting, hunting and social connections. Truly we should as people be above all this manipulation!