A workshop of the Migratory Soaring Birds (MSB) project led by BirdLife International and the United Nations Development Program has prompted the Sudanese government to replace one of the most deadly power lines in Africa for large migratory birds , the Port Sudan “killer line”.
In particular the 31-km long power line is estimated to have killed hundreds and perhaps thousands of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterussince it was constructed in the 1950s. The most recent survey found, during the month of September alone, the carcasses of 17 Egyptian vultures along the power line.All the carcasseswere found under power poles, 15 under metal poles and twounder concrete poles,making electrocution the most likely cause of death.
The March 2013 workshop, funded by the MSB project, was presented by the Sudanese Wildlife Society (SWS) who is the local non-governmental partner in the project. The opening session was held at the offices of the Sudanese Company for Electricity Transmission. Guests included the Director General and senior engineers of the Electricity Transmission Company, the Director of the Sudanese Electricity Distribution Company, the Undersecretary of the Ministry of Tourism and Wildlife, and the Director General of the Wildlife Conservation General Administration.
The President of SWS, Professor Ibrahim Hashim, gave a presentation about the impact of power lines on migratory soaring birds, with the emphasis on the Port Sudan “killer line”. He then introduced the MSB project guidance materials on bird-sensitive power line development [available here].
“Responses from the distinguished speakers were positive”, said Ibrahim Hashim. “All of them stressed the importance of solving the killer power line. The Director of the Electricity Company emphasised the impact of the killer line on birds, as well as the power loss due to electrocution, and he promised to solve the problem.”
The new power line will run parallel to the existing line. The 510 new poles will be insulated with XLPE insulated (AAC) aluminum conductors. The work is expected to take two months, after which the killer line will be removed.
“I was surprised and delighted when I was told that the Electricity Company is working on a new insulated power line that would be finished so soon”, said Professor Hashim. “We thank the Director for fulfilling his promise, which is important for the conservation of Migratory Soaring Birds in the Red Sea area.” The MSB project will follow and report on the progress of the new power line.
Because of nearby rubbish dumps, livestock farms and a slaughterhouse, the area around the power line has historically been an important stopover and wintering site for Egyptian Vultures, though much smaller numbers have been recorded in recent years. In the paperPersistent electrocution mortality of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus over 28 years in East Africa , Professor Hashim and authors from the Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds (BirdLife in Bulgaria) and the RSPB (BirdLife in the UK) suggest “this power line may have caused the death of sufficient Egyptian Vultures to partially explain population declines in the Middle East, from where the electrocuted birds may originate.”
In 2007 the BirdLife/IUCN Red List status of the Egyptian Vulture was raised from Least Concern to Endangered as a consequence of widespread population declines.
Dr. Marco Lambertini, Chief Executive of BirdLife International welcome the decision “This is a great example on how evidence based science help governments, businesses and civil society work together to address drivers of biodiversity loss. The BirdLife International Partnership salutes the commitment of the Sudanese Government and the national Electricity Transmission Company and greatly look forward to the day the “killer line” will be replaced with the new insulated bird friendly power line.” For more information contact the Regional Flyway Facility or the Sudanese Wildlife Society here.
 Angelov I, Hashim I, and Oppel SPersistent electrocution mortality of Egyptian Vultures Neophron percnopterus over 28 years in East AfricaBird Conservation International/Volume23/Issue01/ March 2013, pp 1 – 6
This post was written by Julien Jreissati – who has written 10 posts on BirdLife Community.
Share this post with your friends
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- 7 Common Food Items Not Good for Backyard Birds – [1549 Views]
- Birds Sleep in Giraffe Armpits, New Photos Reveal – [1455 Views]
- POLL: Should Europe’s Wolves be Rewilded? – [1452 Views]
- Karma? Lions Eat Suspected Poacher in South Africa – [1255 Views]
- POLL: Should the clothing industry be “Fur-Free”? – [1203 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts – [1000 Views]
- POLL: Should Norway be sanctioned for boosting its whaling quota? – [901 Views]
- POLL: Should the trafficking of Hippo Teeth be banned? – [881 Views]
- Fang trafficking to China is putting Bolivia’s jaguars in jeopardy – [863 Views]
- POLL: Should Bobcats be kept on the Endangered Species List? – [751 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should hunting with hounds be banned? – [7823 Views]
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farming? – [4595 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of bears and wolves be banned? – [4115 Views]
- POLL: Should Japan be sanctioned for slaughtering dolphins and whales? – [3401 Views]
- POLL: Should the slaughter of badgers in the UK be finally stopped? – [3111 Views]
- POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2873 Views]
- POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2667 Views]
- POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2578 Views]
- POLL: Should wild elephants be sold to Chinese zoos? [2322 Views]
- POLL: Should Japan be sanctioned for slaughtering Minke whales? [2289 Views]