A peer-reviewed paper co-authored by the two organizations reviewed 20 years of data from a test for pesticides in which birds are fed pesticide-laced food for days and then monitored for signs of distress, such as regurgitation or death, before being killed.
The authors found that there were no cases in which this test identified a risk that was not identified in other required tests. Therefore, the EPA can confidently protect the environment without poisoning birds in this cruel test.
The EPA has used the paper’s findings to draft a policy that will allow companies to avoid the test, sparing hundreds of mallards and bobwhite quail each year, along with saving time and taxpayer money—resources that can be better spent advancing non-animal methods that can more quickly and reliably predict the effect of chemicals on humans and the environment.
This announcement comes on the heels of last week’s groundbreaking news that the EPA plans to stop funding and requesting tests on mammals by 2035.
PETA first put animal rights on the EPA’s agenda 20 years ago, and while we wish animal tests would stop now—or had never started—this is the first time a U.S. regulatory agency has made such a commitment.
In fact, the EPA administrator announced today that this collaborative project to save birds is the “first action after my recent directive to aggressively reduce animal testing throughout the Agency.”
We hope it’s the first of many as our scientists continue to work with the EPA and other regulatory agencies to end tests on all animals.
This article was first published by PETA on 17 September 2019.