{"id":2185138,"date":"2025-01-11T06:00:47","date_gmt":"2025-01-11T05:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/focusingonwildlife.com\/news\/?p=2185138"},"modified":"2025-01-11T19:31:43","modified_gmt":"2025-01-11T18:31:43","slug":"consciously-uncoupling-what-drives-rates-of-animal-divorce","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/focusingonwildlife.com\/news\/consciously-uncoupling-what-drives-rates-of-animal-divorce\/","title":{"rendered":"Consciously uncoupling: what drives rates of animal divorce?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In 2011 a shock celebrity break-up garnered headlines around the world \u2013 not the separation of Ashton Kutcher and Demi Moore, nor Jennifer Lopez and Marc Anthony, but the sudden, inexplicable rupture between Bibi and Poldi, two 115-year-old Gal\u00e1pagos tortoises at Happ reptile zoo in Austria.<\/p>\n

\"Two
Two Galapagos Tortoises. Photograph: Paula Cobleigh\/Getty Images\/iStockphoto<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

After nearly a century as a couple, the female, Bibi, had had enough: one day, she bit a chunk off Poldi\u2019s shell, drawing blood, and continued to attack him until zoo staff moved him to a separate enclosure.<\/p>\n

In the wild, Gal\u00e1pagos tortoises are not monogamous, so it\u2019s no small feat that Bibi and Poldi\u2019s liaison lasted as long as it did, though their coupling never produced any offspring. Attempts at reconciliation were not successful. \u201cWe get the feeling they can\u2019t stand the sight of each other any more,\u201d the zoo\u2019s director, Helga Happ, lamented at the time.<\/p>\n

Why do breakups occur? Among humans it\u2019s a question that has engendered ballads, provided rich fodder for novelists and continues to intrigue scientists.<\/p>\n

Birds tend to have partnerships and mammals don\u2019t
\nProf Simon Griffith<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To break up, of course, you have to be together in the first place. In social monogamy, animals live together and form strong ties known as pair bonds \u2013 though sexual faithfulness is a separate question. In mammals, humans are among the exceptions: social monogamy has been observed in less than 10% of mammal species.<\/p>\n

That low figure comes down to the difference in parental investment between males and females, says Prof Simon Griffith, an evolutionary ecologist at Macquarie University. In most mammal species, parental care comes primarily from the female, who invests hugely in gestating and providing milk for her young.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn many mammals, there\u2019s no parental care by the dad,\u201d Griffith says. \u201cIt may be that he\u2019ll do a bit of guarding, or he\u2019ll hold the territory, but \u2026 he can\u2019t really provide that much for the offspring.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn birds, it\u2019s completely different. The dad can actually care almost as much as the female in terms of delivering food.<\/p>\n

\u201cThat\u2019s why birds tend to have partnerships and mammals don\u2019t.\u201d<\/p>\n

Before methods to establish paternity existed, evidence suggested that birds as a group were mostly sexually monogamous, says Prof Raoul Mulder, an evolutionary ecologist at the University of Melbourne.<\/p>\n

\"A
A black-browed albatross and its chick nesting in the Falkland Islands. Photograph: Andy Rouse\/PA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cIf you look at whether or not a particular species pairs, and how long they pair for, and how long they stay together for, and you classify all the known birds, you\u2019d arrive at a figure of over 90%,\u201d Mulder says.<\/p>\n

But after genetic testing techniques were developed, scientists began to realise that birds were not as faithful as previously believed \u2013 that social and sexual monogamy don\u2019t necessarily go hand in hand. Mulder\u2019s work on the superb fairywren found that 76% of chicks born in nests were fathered by other males. That astonishing rate of cuckoldry is bested only by the Australian magpie at a rate as high as 82%.<\/p>\n

On the whole, however, Australian birds tend to divorce less than European species, Griffith says, as strong partnerships are required to survive fickle environmental conditions. In the northern hemisphere, the timing of breeding seasons is predictable, tied to day length, but in Australia the decision to breed also depends on climatic factors.<\/p>\n

\u201cSome years, you literally don\u2019t get any rain that\u2019s meaningful and nothing grows, and the birds and animals that live there can\u2019t breed,\u201d Griffith says of Australia\u2019s arid zone. \u201c[Breeding] is a much more complicated decision at an individual level but, if you\u2019re in a good partnership, you can together optimise that decision.\u201d<\/p>\n

Among birds, the poster child for monogamy is the wandering albatross, which can live up to 50 years and usually mates for life. \u201cThis bird takes such a long time to establish a pair bond,\u201d says Dr Ruijiao Sun, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of California, Santa Barbara. \u201cIf an individual loses their partner, it takes years to bond with a new one to be able to start breeding again.<\/p>\n

\u201cWandering albatrosses only have one egg at each breeding season but there always needs to be one parent sitting on the nest to protect their chick and do the incubating but they also need to forage \u2026 so they have to take turns.<\/p>\n

\u201cIt really takes two to be able to raise their chicks.\u201d<\/p>\n

Sun suggests long-lived species such as the wandering albatross benefit more from strong pair bonds. \u201cEach time they breed, they fine-tune their behaviours \u2013 they coordinate with each other much better, making reproduction effortless [over time].\u201d<\/p>\n

\"Astonishing
Astonishing rate of cuckoldry: the Australian magpie. Photograph: GPLama\/Shutterstock<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Short-lived species, in contrast, might be more ready to ditch their partner to maximise breeding opportunities. Even so, Sun\u2019s research estimates that the divorce rate in wandering albatrosses is about 10%. (Compare this to the king penguin, which, though sexually monogamous while with a partner, divorces at a rate of about 80%.)<\/p>\n

Other factors that might drive animals to divorce \u2013 what scientists call mate switching \u2013 include a high mortality rate and a skewed sex ratio. Both drive up competition for mates, creating temptation for those of the minority sex to shack up with someone more appealing.<\/p>\n

Research is also emerging that the climate crisis may also play a role in divorce. In a study of snow petrels, which nest in rock crevices in Antarctica, Sun and her co-authors found that the number of snow days in a breeding season was directly linked to the rate of break-ups. Too much snow fills nests and freezes the eggs, leading to incubation failure.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey may either abandon their previous nest or abandon their partner,\u201d Sun says, adding that the stress of constant snow-shovelling might make birds \u201cblame their partner more than they normally would do\u201d.<\/p>\n

The work projected that declining sea ice under climate change would also affect survival rates in future, skewing the sex ratio. \u201cWe will have a lot of males in a population, and fewer females available to mate with them,\u201d Sun says.<\/p>\n

Stress and spousal blame probably also play a role in the Falkland Islands, where unusually warm water temperatures have been linked to higher divorce rates in black-browed albatrosses. \u201cEnvironmentally driven divorce,\u201d the researchers suggested at the time, \u201cmay therefore represent an overlooked consequence of global change.\u201d<\/p>\n

This article<\/a> by Donna Lu was first published by The Guardian on 29 December 2024. Lead Image: Among birds, the poster child for monogamy is the wandering albatross, which can live up to 50 years and usually mates for life. Photograph: Otto Whitehead.<\/i><\/p>\n

What you can do<\/h2>\n

Help to save wildlife by making a monthly or one-time donation as little as $1.<\/p>\n