In search of the common wildcat nobody knows<\/h2>\n
Herbst carried out her study in the Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park, a known African wildcat habitat straddling the borders of South Africa and Botswana. The small wildcats there were assumed to be far enough from urban areas to still be genetically pure, not having interbred with domestic cats (deemed one of the wild species\u2019 greatest risks).<\/p>\n
Sighting the little wildcats relatively often, Herbst hoped they would also be relatively easy to catch, collar and track. They weren\u2019t. Twenty years later, she recalls the challenges.<\/p>\n
The small cats are shy and elusive, taking cover in fox or aardvark holes and under tree roots; on farms, they hide amid tall, dense corn stalks. Adding to her difficulties, the cat is nocturnal and practically impossible to study in its habitat without aid of radio telemetry.<\/p>\n
To accomplish that, they must first be caught. Herbst recalls that in trying, she captured lots of other stuff. Jackals in particular were attracted to the chicken-baited cage traps. But over time, she succeeded in catching and collaring numbers of the elusive cats.<\/p>\n
Another hazard of low-budget research on a noncharismatic species: Herbst\u2019s hand-me-down 4\u00d74 vehicle, in which she spent countless hours alone rumbling in the dark over roadless terrain, took a terrible beating.<\/p>\n
But those nights rewarded her with sights few ever see, encountering the park\u2019s big cats, including the famed black-maned lion (Panthera leo leo), cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and leopard (P. pardus). Once in the dark, while sipping coffee inside her 4\u00d74, she was startled by a full-grown hyena that nonchalantly sniffed the side-view mirror. They\u2019re \u201cmuch bigger than you think,\u201d she says.<\/p>\n
Over time, Herbst came to know the Afro-Asiatic wildcat as \u201ca really special little species that plays a vital role in ecosystems.\u201d<\/p>\n You could be forgiven for mistaking an Afro-Asiatic wildcat for a family pet. They\u2019re the size of a large domestic cat (F. catus), but with longer legs. Their coloration varies by region from reddish, sandy and tawny brown, to greyish. They sport faint tabby stripes or spots, more pronounced in humid areas, and paler and darker in drier climes. Their tails are slim and tapered with a dark tip. A distinguishing feature, Herbst says, is the pinkish-orange tint of their ears.<\/p>\n Afro-Asiatic wildcats are highly adaptable to landscape (especially bush and steppe), season and prey availability. They prefer hunting small rodents but dabble in reptiles and invertebrates. Herbst recalls male cats taking down spring hares roughly the same size as they were. Cats with waterholes in their territories became bird-hunting specialists. One female was great at hunting sandgrouse as they came to drink. The stomach of an Afro-Asiatic wildcat from Oman contained beetles, grasshoppers, lizards, mammal fur and a date pit.<\/p>\n The species is mostly solitary and roams widely. In the United Arab Emirates, a collared cat had a larger home range (52.7 square kilometers or 20.3 square miles), far larger than that reported in the more optimal habitat (around 3.5 km\u00b2 or 1.4 mi\u00b2) of the Kalahari, where food and water are relatively easy at hand.<\/p>\n Ghoddousi says the wildcat\u2019s remarkable adaptability to various habitats, tolerance of different elevations and climates, plus its capacity to coexist with larger predators make it very special \u2014 allowing it to spread over two continents. Because they\u2019re so widely distributed, with incidental sightings reported from many locations, the species is considered relatively stable and \u201cof least concern.\u201d<\/p>\n But Ghoddousi warns this might not reflect the species\u2019 true state in the wild. Due to lack of research, and therefore lack of data, the real-world trend for far-flung Afro-Asiatic wildcat populations remains unknown. Ghoddousi says the big risk is that, as global change escalates, the species could slip away before science notices and conservationists can take action.<\/p>\n Ranging over such a wide area, the Afro-Asiatic wildcat goes by many regional names. It\u2019s the African wildcat to some, the Asiatic wildcat to others, and the Indian desert cat to still others.<\/p>\n Scientifically, the Afro-Asiatic wildcat is divided into three evolutionarily similar subspecies. The first, F. lybica lybica, occurs in Eastern, Western and Northern Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. The second, F. lybica cafra (the topic of Herbst\u2019s Ph.D.), occurs in Southern Africa. The third, F. lybica ornata, is found in Southwestern and Central Asia, Pakistan, India, Mongolia and China. The precise boundaries of subspecies\u2019 ranges are unclear.<\/p>\n Until 2017, these three subspecies were lumped together with the European wildcat and considered subspecies of F. silvestris. But further investigation demanded a split: Now, populations that roam from the steppes and bush of Africa and Asia are classified as F. lybica, while the European wildcat is classified as a separate species (with its bushy tail and more distinctive coat markings, F. silvestris occurs in fragmented populations across Europe, Turkey and the Caucasus.<\/p>\n These geographically separated cat populations mixed things up genetically at various points in time, due to natural changes or, sometimes, thanks to people. Thousands of years ago, this long-term and complex intermingling process birthed the first domestic cat.<\/p>\n Paleogeneticist Claudio Ottoni wouldn\u2019t describe himself as a cat person, and his work takes place far from the wild. But under his microscope, the ancient lives and movements of the Afro-Asiatic wildcat come to life, revealing hints to the tantalizing mystery as to how it long ago threw in its lot with humanity to evolve into today\u2019s domestic cat species.<\/p>\n Paleogeneticists, it turns out, find the small wildcat just as elusive as field biologists. Compared with other domesticated animals, hypotheses about early cat domestication remain grounded in scant evidence and open questions. Ancient cat bones are scarce, and distinguishing differences between wild and domestic skeletal features is challenging.<\/p>\n But Ottoni has been a dogged researcher, puzzling for years over perplexing data, embracing and developing a hypothesis, then revising the shape of that hypothesis as new technology and data become available to move toward a more robust theory.<\/p>\n An early theory, published in 2017, was that farmers in southwest Africa had domesticated cats and brought them to Cyprus in the early Neolithic period (at least 7,000 years ago) to control rats and mice that damaged stored grain.<\/p>\n This origin story was based on clues found in the DNA of 352 long-dead felids. Researchers analyzed maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA in bits of cat bone and teeth, as well as skin and hair samples found at archaeological sites.<\/p>\n The oldest samples included a complete cat skeleton, dated to roughly 7500 BCE, found buried with a man on Cyprus, suggesting the hypothesis that domestication started here.<\/p>\n Other samples included six skeletons, dating to around 3700 BCE, found in an elite Predynastic Egyptian cemetery. Still other examples were found in archaeological digs at the Roman-Egyptian port of Berenike on the Red Sea. Ottoni also compared the ancient cat DNA samples with modern wildcat samples from Bulgaria and Eastern Africa.<\/p>\n Together, the DNA seemed to indicate that the domestic cat\u2019s worldwide conquest began in the Fertile Crescent (perhaps on Cyprus some 7,000 years ago), then gained momentum during Classical Antiquity about 2,500 years ago, when the Egyptian cat successfully spread throughout the Old World along land and sea trade routes.<\/p>\n This analysis seemed to confirm that while the Afro-Asiatic wildcat was the ultimate source of the domesticated cat, its evolution and spread wasn\u2019t simple: Though the North African\/Southwest Asian F. lybica was a source, both the Near Eastern and Egyptian F. lybica populations also contributed to the domestic cat\u2019s gene pool at several points in history.<\/p>\n Since 2017, new technology and more data have modified, added detail and complicated this storyline. While earlier work relied on mitochondrial DNA analysis, researchers were able to analyze nuclear DNA for an updated theory in 2025.<\/p>\n This higher-resolution analysis reveals the full genetic code of individual cat specimens, including not only the maternal, but also the paternal inherited DNA. It provides \u201cthe actual ancestry,\u201d Ottoni says. And this new data punched an unexpected hole in the previous theory of cat domestication. For one, domestication happened thousands of years later than thought, and then was probably not due to African farmers who traveled to Cyprus.<\/p>\n \u201cEvolutionarily speaking, it\u2019s a very peculiar case,\u201d Ottoni says of the discordance between the 2017 and 2025 DNA findings.<\/p>\n The new data showed what scientists call \u201cmitonuclear discordance,\u201d where analyses using mitochondrial DNA markers yield different conclusions than those using nuclear DNA markers. Surprisingly, samples that the researchers thought were F. lybica turned out to be those of the European wildcat. So, while wildcats were indeed taken to Cyprus, Ottoni explains, this might have been an isolated attempt of Neoolithic people to domesticate European wildcats, rather than wildcats brought from Africa.<\/p>\n The evidence now suggests that European wildcat and African wildcat distribution probably overlapped in the past, perhaps due to climatic shifts or other natural causes. Because both species are interfertile, they sporadically bred, leading to a mixed population living in Turkey.<\/p>\n According to the updated theory, domestic cats with a lybica genome only appeared in Europe about 2000 years ago, during Classical Antiquity, Ottoni says, but then adds, \u201cWe can\u2019t say precisely when the domestication process that led to the cat dispersal started.\u201d<\/p>\n Perhaps, and more likely, domesticated cats did come first from Egypt, where cats were buried in the Hierakonpolis (the ancient Egyptian royal residence). But whatever the exact origin story, we do know that \u201cin evolutionary terms, [the domestic cat is] one of the most successful mammal species in the world,\u201d Ottoni says.<\/p>\n Domestic cats today are found on every continent except Antarctica. (They were introduced to sub-Antarctic Marion Island in 1949 to control mice, but were later eradicated due to negative impacts on native birds.)<\/p>\n Researchers have also learned that the close genetic kinship shared by domesticated and wild felids species really matters: The widespread prevalence of F. catus, and its capacity to interbreed with F. lybica, is among the most serious threats to the Afro-Asiatic wildcat\u2019s survival.<\/p>\n Hybridization with domestic cats is widespread across the Afro-Asiatic wildcat\u2019s range, though some studies, including Herbst\u2019s work, have shown that wildcat populations in South Africa at least, especially in protected areas, appear to remain genetically pure.<\/p>\n However, according to the 2022 IUCN species assessment, there\u2019s insufficient information on the level of hybridization with domestic cats in other parts of the range, and therefore, this threat should not be underestimated or ignored.<\/p>\n As such, Herbst points to responsible pet ownership as key to Afro-Asiatic wildcat survival. That includes spaying by pet owners of their domestic cats that aren\u2019t being bred, and also community spaying of feral cats (especially in urban areas bordering protected areas where wildcats live). Education is important, too, she notes.<\/p>\n Though spaying is an important conservation measure, spayed domestic cats can still seriously impact wildcat food sources. The IUCN assessment points out that feral domestic cats compete with wildcats for prey and space, and there is also a high potential for disease transmission between them.<\/p>\n Other threats include the risk of roadkill and poisoning and conflicts with farmers and local people due to attacks on poultry by wildcats leading to retaliatory killings. Another serious threat, Ghoddousi says, is lack of information, causing scientists to underestimate the risk a species faces. Unfortunately, that is always the case when you don\u2019t have enough data, he says. You can\u2019t make a meaningful judgment about a species status if you simply do not know.<\/p>\n Ghoddousi, A., Belbachir, F., Durant, S. M., Herbst, M., & Rosen, T. (2022). Felis lybica. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2022: e.T131299383A154907281. doi:10.2305\/IUCN.UK.2022-1.RLTS.T131299383A154907281.en<\/p>\n Harrison, D. L., & Bates, P. J. (1991). The mammals of Arabia.<\/p>\n Phelan, P., & Sliwa, A. (2005). Range size and den use of Gordon\u2019s wildcats felis silvestris gordoni in the emirate of Sharjah, United Arab Emirates. Journal of Arid Environments, 60(1), 15-25. doi:10.1016\/j.jaridenv.2004.03.010<\/p>\n Ottoni, C., Van Neer, W., De Cupere, B., Daligault, J., Guimar\u00e3es, S., Peters, J., Spassov, N., Prendergast, M. E., Boivin, N., Morales-Mu\u00f1iz, A., B\u0103l\u0103\u0219escu, A., Becker, C., Benecke, N., Boroneant, A., Buitenhuis, H., Chahoud, J., Crowther, A., Llorente, L., \u2026 Geigl, E.-M. (2017). The palaeogenetics of cat dispersal in the ancient world. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(7), 0139. doi:10.1038\/s41559-017-0139<\/p>\n Driscoll, C. A., Clutton-Brock, J., Kitchener, A. C., & O\u2019Brien, S. J. (2009). The Taming of the Cat. Scientific American. Retrieved from https:\/\/nsuworks.nova.edu\/cnso_bio_facarticles\/477\/<\/p>\n Ottoni, C., Van Neer, W., De Cupere, B., Daligault, J., Guimar\u00e3es, S., Peters, J., Spassov, N., Prendergast, M. E., Boivin, N., Morales-Mu\u00f1iz, A., B\u0103l\u0103\u0219escu, A., Becker, C., Benecke, N., Boroneant, A., Buitenhuis, H., Chahoud, J., Crowther, A., Llorente, L., \u2026 Geigl, E.-M. (2025). The dispersal of domestic cats from Northern Africa and their introduction to Europe over the last two millennia. bioRxiv. doi:10.1101\/2025.03.28.645893<\/p>\nA small cat with big adaptability<\/h2>\n
The domestication of Felis lybica<\/h2>\n
New tech, new data, better theory<\/h2>\n
A small cat facing big challenges<\/h2>\n
Citations:<\/h2>\n