To understand what\u2019s going on, we have to get just a little bit in the weeds. A version of this bill has already passed the House of Representatives. The Senate is aiming to vote on it before July 4. This bill can move forward through a process called budget reconciliation, which means it can pass with fewer votes in Congress than other legislation typically requires.<\/p>\n
So, why should wildlife supporters be worried about this budget reconciliation bill? Here are three parts of the legislation that would harm America\u2019s wildlife and our natural world:<\/p>\n
1. The sell-off or destruction of our public lands<\/h2>\n
The bill mandates selling two to three million acres of public lands across 11 western states to the highest bidder, without any public process or input from public land users.<\/p>\n
Several provisions also propose sacrificing wildlife refuges, national forests, and marine sanctuary areas in the pursuit of expanded energy and resource extraction. The bill would require leasing parts of the Alaskan Arctic, Pacific Northwest forests, and the Gulf Coast\u2014among other beloved natural spaces\u2014to oil, gas, and logging companies.<\/p>\n
Additionally, the bill would force through projects that were previously denied because they would cause irreversible harm to local ecosystems, wildlife, and communities. One such project is a road through Northwest Alaska, which could prevent caribou herds from reaching critical calving grounds.<\/p>\n Finally, the budget bill proposes reducing the royalties oil, gas, and coal companies have to pay to extract resources from public lands. Lower royalties means reducing revenues for states and local communities, while subsidizing extractive industries with the taxes of hard working Americans.<\/p>\n Policies that chip away at public lands are deeply unpopular. Facing public pressure, lawmakers removed the public lands sell-off provision from the House budget reconciliation bill. Unfortunately, the Senate has proposed putting far worse sell-off language back in.<\/p>\n One provision in the bill allows companies to pay opt-in fees to destroy habitat, pollute the environment, or harm our climate without proper review and public input. It would undermine the National Environmental Policy Act\u2014the landmark law that has helped our country protect and save habitats for countless wildlife species for 50 years.<\/p>\n Under this \u201cpay to play\u201d proposal, companies and developers could pay a fee, covering the cost of conducting an environmental review plus an additional 25%, in exchange for an abbreviated review. It would also guarantee that the review could not be challenged in court\u2014regardless of whether the process was adequate or lawful.<\/p>\n This arrangement essentially removes everyone except companies and government agencies from the decision-making process. It leaves few chances for people and communities to stand up for the wildlife and communities whose air, water, homes, and health are at stake.<\/p>\n The reconciliation bill proposes loosening or pausing rules on the release of toxic, climate-harming gasses and chemicals into our air, lands, and waters. It also takes back funding meant for programs that protect communities and wildlife from pollution.<\/p>\n The funding cuts target efforts to address air pollution in schools, hold companies accountable for emissions, and tackle environmental injustice\u2014among many other programs. Incentives for clean energy production would be slashed, increasing our reliance on the dirtiest and most costly sources of energy and killing up to 830,000 jobs by 2030. The bill even claws back money dedicated to improving the efficiency, accuracy, and speed of environmental reviews, while at the same time creating expedited, untouchable review options for companies that can pay.<\/p>\n If the Senate passes the reconciliation bill as-is, the public is at risk of losing millions of acres of beloved natural lands. Oil, gas, mining, and development companies would get to sail through environmental reviews by paying a fee. And many safeguards meant to maintain a stable climate and protect clean air, water, and soil would crumble.<\/p>\n For already-dwindling caribou herds in Alaska\u2019s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, this legislation could mean a faster-melting tundra, a dangerously fragmented migration route, and crucial habitat replaced by oil wells.<\/p>\n A caribou calf in Alaska\u2014along with wildlife all across the country\u2014is counting on us to speak up about this botched budget. The time to act is now: take a look at this action alert from our friends at the National Wildlife Federation Action Fund that calls on the Senate to revise the budget reconciliation bill so it does not harm wildlife and the habitats they depend on.<\/p>\n2. \u201cPay to Play\u201d provision to harm habitat, lands, waters, and air<\/h2>\n
3. Relaxing rules and gutting programs that keep us safer and healthier<\/h2>\n