Last winter, commercial beekeepers lost more than 60% of their colonies \u2013 their worst losses on record. We tend to blame bee losses on separate, singular threats: pests, pesticides, habitat loss or extreme weather. But we\u2019ve been thinking about bee losses wrong.<\/p>\n
The real culprit is our industrial food system.<\/p>\n
Managed honeybees are in effect gig workers, the tiniest hired laborers in agriculture. They contribute more than $15bn to the US food system, and \u2013 along with native bees and other pollinators \u2013 help pollinate more than 130 types of fruits, nuts and vegetables in the US. To accomplish this feat each year, bees are trucked cross-country from one crop to the next, constantly fed supplements, bred for productivity, exposed to pesticides and pushed to pollinate on a schedule. This kind of management is grueling for beekeepers \u2013 and as we mark National Pollinator Week, it\u2019s pushing bees to the brink.<\/p>\n
California\u2019s annual almond bloom offers a prime example. Each February, beekeepers truck more than 2m bee colonies to the state, more than 95% of the country\u2019s commercial colonies, to pollinate 1.4m acres of blooming almonds. It\u2019s the largest, most concentrated pollination event in the world \u2013 what\u2019s been referred to as the Super Bowl of beekeeping.<\/p>\n
But almond pollination poses great risks for beekeepers and their bees. As bees fly through orchards, they drift into other colonies and spread parasitic varroa mites \u2013 the industry\u2019s primary pest \u2013 and the deadly diseases they carry.<\/p>\n
Bees are also exposed to agrochemicals while pollinating almonds and other crops. Almond growers sometimes spray fungicides during bloom to protect their crops. But because of our current pesticide label regulations, sublethal agrochemicals such as fungicides or inert pesticide ingredients may not be labeled as toxic to bees \u2013 even though they can stunt bee growth, reproduction and foraging navigation.<\/p>\n
The timing of almond pollination adds additional pressure. Colonies aren\u2019t usually at peak strength in February, but growers want active, productive hives. To meet demand, beekeepers feed their charges supplements year-round \u2013 which are expensive and can be less nutritious than natural nectar and pollen \u2013 and breed the most productive bee queens, which can be more susceptible to varroa mites.<\/p>\n
Amid these challenges, commercial beekeepers rely intensely on income from almond pollination and other crops in part because cheap, foreign \u2013 and often adulterated \u2013 honey has flooded the market and driven prices below the cost of production.<\/p>\n
Beekeepers are also losing the floral oases where they historically produced honey. For example, each summer, beekeepers truck more than 40% of the country\u2019s colonies to the northern Great Plains to forage on native and conservation grasslands and produce honey. Yet since the early 2000s, farmers have plowed millions of acres of grasslands to grow biofuel crops such as corn and soy. In addition to reducing forage for bees, the crops come with a toxic suite of agrochemicals that can drift or leach off-farm and weaken bee colonies.<\/p>\n
The Trump administration is adding fuel to the fire by gutting bee research when beekeepers need it most. In April, the US Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced it would decommission the Beltsville Bee Research Lab in Maryland, one of only five USDA bee labs in the country. For more than 90 years, Beltsville researchers have supported beekeepers through crises with free disease detection and research on overwintering losses, and by developing pest control protocols. Now, beekeepers will lose that vital ally.<\/p>\n
The shuttering of the bee lab comes on top of the planned closure of 57 of 77 US Forest Service research sites, which oversee 193m acres of public lands that provide crucial bee habitat. The administration also aims to decommission 16 research centers in the US Geological Service (USGS). This includes one in North Dakota, the Northern Prairie Research Center, which has studied how land-use changes in the midwest affect bee health, and a USGS bee lab, also in Maryland, that supports native bee research throughout the country.<\/p>\n
Beekeepers have historically borne the brunt of these stresses. But as losses mount, they are likely to charge farmers more for their pollination services or simply have fewer bees to offer. These costs could ripple downstream and affect what we all pay for pollinator-dependent food. We\u2019ll probably see smaller harvests, more expensive fruits and vegetables, and less diversity in the produce aisle.<\/p>\n
We\u2019ve arrived at a crucial moment. Bee declines may seem like an environmental tragedy at the margins, but their losses destabilize our food system. The problem isn\u2019t a series of isolated issues; it\u2019s a nexus of stressors built by the very agriculture system that depends on them. To support bees, we need to \u2013 at the very least \u2013 restore and increase funding for pollinator research, maintain and plant more conservation lands across the US, and require pesticide labels to better disclose sublethal toxicities.<\/p>\n
Bees and beekeepers have been doing their part. It\u2019s time our food system did too.<\/p>\n