Aug 072013

A starved polar bear found found dead in Svalbard as “little more than skin and bones” perished due to a lack of sea ice on which to hunt seals, according to a reknowned polar bear expert. Climate change has reduced sea ice in the Arctic to record lows in the last year and Dr Ian Stirling, who has studied the bears for almost 40 years and examined the animal, said the lack of ice forced the bear into ranging far and wide in an ultimately unsuccessful search for food.

This 16-year-old male polar bear died of starvation resulting from the lack of ice on which to hunt seals. Photograph: Ashley Cooper/Global Warming Images

“From his lying position in death, the bear appears to simply have starved and died where he dropped,” Stirling said. “He had no external suggestion of any remaining fat, having been reduced to little more than skin and bone.”

The bear had been examined by scientists from the Norwegian Polar Institute in April in the southern part of Svalbard, an Arctic island archipelago, and appeared healthy. The same bear had been captured in the same area in previous years, suggesting that the discovery of its body, 250km away in northern Svalbard in July, represented an unusual movement away from its normal range. The bear probably followed the fjords inland as it trekked north, meaning it may have walked double or treble that distance.

Polar bears feed almost exclusively on seals and need sea ice to capture their prey. But 2012 saw the lowest level of sea ice in the Arctic on record. Prond Robertson, at the Norwegian Meteorological Institute, said: “The sea ice break up around Svalbard in 2013 was both fast and very early.” He said recent years had been poor for ice around the islands: “Warm water entered the western fjords in 2005-06 and since then has not shifted.”

Stirling, now at Polar Bears International and previously at the University of Alberta and the Canadian Wildlife Service, said: “Most of the fjords and inter-island channels in Svalbard did not freeze normally last winter and so many potential areas known to that bear for hunting seals in spring do not appear to have been as productive as in a normal winter. As a result, the bear likely went looking for food in another area but appears to have been unsuccessful.”

Scientists are tracking polar bears with radio collars in Svalbard, Norway, to monitor their search for food. Photograph: Ashley Cooper/Global Warming Images

Research published in May showed that loss of sea ice was harming the health, breeding success and population size of the polar bears of Hudson Bay, Canada as they spent longer on land waiting for the sea to refreeze. Other work has shown polar bear weights are declining. In February, a panel of polar bear experts published a paper stating that rapid ice loss meant options such the feeding of starving bears by humans needed to be considered to protect the 20,000-25,000 animals thought to remain.

The International Union for the Conservation of Nature, the world’s largest professional conservation network, states that of the 19 populations of polar bear around the Arctic, data is available for 12. Of those, eight are declining, three are stable and one is increasing.

The IUCN predicts that increasing ice loss will mean between one-third and a half of polar bears will be lost in the next three generations, about 45 years. But the US and Russian governments said in March that faster-than-expected ice losses could mean two-thirds are lost.

Attributing a single incident to climate change can be controversial, but Douglas Richardson, head of living collections at the Highland Wildlife Park near Kingussie, said: “It’s not just one bear though. There are an increasing number of bears in this condition: they are just not putting down enough fat to survive their summer fast. This particular polar bear is the latest bit of evidence of the impact of climate change.”

Ice loss due to climate change is “absolutely, categorically and without question” the cause of falling polar bear populations, said Richardson, who cares for the UK’s only publicly kept polar bears. He said 16 years was not particularly old for a wild male polar bear, which usually live into their early 20s. “There may have been some underlying disease, but I would be surprised if this was anything other than starvation,” he said. “Once polar bears reach adulthood they are normally nigh on indestructible, they are hard as nails.”

Jeff Flocken, at the International Fund for Animal Welfare, said: “While it is difficult to ascribe a single death or act to climate change it couldn’t be clearer that drastic and long-term changes in their Arctic habitat threaten the survival of the polar bear. The threat of habitat loss from climate change, exacerbated by unsustainable killing for commercial trade in Canada, could lead to the demise of one of the world’s most iconic animals, and this would be a true tragedy.”

This article was written by Damian Carrington for the Guardian UK.

Leave a Comment

  • http://facebook.com/profile.php?id=137390342990166 Jacqueline Deely Photography

    Breaks my heart to see this and I wholeheartedly agree with Mark. We CAN do something, but it has to happen NOW!

  • http://facebook.com/profile.php?id=879700654 Lorraine Rainey Stofa

    I agree with Mark McCandlish. All hunting, oil exploration, should be halted immediately and the area should be protected for generations to come…

  • http://facebook.com/profile.php?id=1164304468 Mark McCandlish

    There is something deeply disturbing and it fills me with great sadness to see such a magnificent creature starve to death for lack of sea ice. Particularly when I consider the beliefs of many of my conservative friends who brush off global warming as a mere conspiracy theory. Given the anticipated decline of the Polar Bear, based on these projections, the species should be declared “endangered”, all hunting stopped world-wide and genetic sampling and long-term storage of this material should begin immediately, so that if climate change does not turn around in a decade, the genetic diversity of the population can be saved for the future restoration of this species. Forty years is the blink of an eye in geological time. The work has to begin NOW.

Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days

  1. POLL: Should the ban on fox hunting be relaxed in the UK? » [2843 Views]
  2. POLL: Should the wolf hunting contest in Idaho be stopped? » [1732 Views]
  3. POLL: Should Grey Squirrels be Culled in the UK? » [1333 Views]
  4. POLL: Should bear hunting be banned in the US? » [954 Views]
  5. Watch: How Did a Young Elephant Drive Off 14 Lions? » [674 Views]
  6. Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts » [530 Views]
  7. POLL: Should the Canadian Government bring an end to the annual seal slaughter? Shocking Video! » [493 Views]
  8. Ornithologists Map Family Tree of Mysterious Cotinga Birds » [485 Views]
  9. The inconvenient solution to the rhino poaching crisis » [413 Views]
  10. How Did Porcupine Repel 17 Lions? Explaining Viral Video » [407 Views]

Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months

  1. » POLL: Should the ban on fox hunting be relaxed in the UK? [10958 Views]
  2. POLL: Should the Faroe Islands’ whale slaughter be allowed to continue? » [7961 Views]
  3. POLL: Should the fox-hunting laws in the UK be relaxed? » [7401 Views]
  4. POLL: Should the Dolphin Slaughter in Taiji Cove be stopped? » [5656 Views]
  5. Petition: Stop Lion Canned Hunting in South Africa – Shocking Video » [4690 Views]
  6. Komodo and its Dragons » [4604 Views]
  7. POLL: Should bear hunting be banned in the US? » [3965 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the trophy hunting of giraffes be banned? » [3192 Views]
  9. POLL: Should China’s shameful tiger farms be closed down? » [2902 Views]
  10. POLL: Should the slaughter of wolves in British Columbia be banned? » [2880 Views]