US to import baby elephants from Zimbabwe despite uproar

  • 818
    Shares


US zoos now plan to import baby elephants from , undeterred by the international furore over their 2016 import of 18 wild elephants from Swaziland.

The US Association of Zoos and Aquariums (AZA) media liaison, Rob Vernon, has confirmed “knowledge of a possible () import by AZA members and others,” but denied knowledge of which facilities are involved. Unconfirmed reports from a reputable Zimbabwean source state that San Diego Zoo is likely to be one of the importers.

US to import baby elephants from Zimbabwe despite uproar

Vernon did not reply to queries whether AZA endorsed the import of wild-caught elephants.

This import is despite ongoing international campaigns against Zimbabwe’s wild-caught elephant trade and international condemnation for the 2016 US purchase of 18 wild elephants from eSwatini (Swaziland) by AZA accredited zoos.

Of the “Swazi 18” sold to Omaha’s Henry Doorly Zoo, Wichita’s Sedgwick County Zoo and Dallas Zoo, two have died (one during preparation for the export) and two were re-sold – despite promises to keep families together, which is vital to their physical and emotional welfare.

Adding to this, in violation to CITES (Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species) regulations and International Air Transport Association (IATA) transport guidelines, one of the exported elephants was pregnant.

“It is unconscionable that US zoos would continue to play a part in perpetuating the cruel trade in live elephants. This seriously undermines any claim by zoos to care about animal welfare or the conservation of African elephants,” says Catherine Doyle, Director at the Performing Animal Welfare Society (PAWS).

US captive elephant populations are declining, necessitating the continued import of wild- caught elephants. In AZA accredited zoos alone 76 elephants, 24 of which were under the age of 2, have died since 2000 – an estimated death rate 54% of captive-born calves.

Roughly 305 elephants are being held at 62 AZA accredited zoos in the US. Meanwhile 37 wild-caught juvenile elephants are currently incarcerated near pending a stalled export to zoos in and Pakistan.

This is in addition to the approximately 125 baby elephants Zimbabwe has sold to Asia since 2012, despite ongoing international resistance and objections by animal welfare organisations worldwide, including the Zimbabwean NSPCA, who state that the cruel exports have no conservation value to Zimbabwe’s elephant populations.

Over US$ 2.5 million has been made from elephant sales so far. It is unclear whether this money has benefited wildlife conservation. Chairman of the Zimbabwean NSPCA Ed Lanca, says “There is no sound basis for the removal of wild-caught baby elephants to facilities that are ill equipped nor prepared to provide adequate long-term care for these animals.”

According to CITES Appendix II listing, under which Zimbabwe’s elephants are listed, trade in live elephants is allowed only “to appropriate and acceptable destinations” that “promote in situ conservation”.

But research by elephant experts confirm that zoos are unable to provide for the physical and emotional welfare of elephants, and high mortality rates and ineffectual breeding of captive elephants undermines conservation efforts.

“(…) zoos, as they currently exist, are not suitably equipped to house and care for, and should not be considered appropriate and acceptable destinations for, live, wild-sourced African elephants,” says a CITES report on International Trade in live and wild-caught African elephants by Keith Lindsey of the Amboseli Trust for Elephants and Iris Ho of Humane Society International.

The IUCN Specialist Group said in 2003: “Believing there to be no direct benefit for in situ conservation of African elephants, the Specialist Group of the IUCN Species Survival Commission does not endorse the removal of African elephants from the wild for any captive use.”

CITES regulations also state that elephant exports must “not be detrimental to the survival of the species” and the animals must be “legally obtained.”

But Zimbabwean NGO, PESLawyers says that the elephant trade permits are illegal, in contravention to national law and CITES regulations since due process and public participation has been ignored.

An interdict to halt the export of the 37 elephants has been launched by the People and Earth Solidarity Law Network (PESLawyers) in Harare.

“CITES regulations are being broken with no regard and no address to the flouting of terms by both Zimbabwe and China. National Laws (of) Zimbabwe’s Wildlife Act are clear and the capture and export of wildlife has to meet a specific criteria, the current crises (of) “snatch and go” (of wild baby elephants) with neither transparency nor accountability is unlawful,” says a letter addressed to the European Parliament from wildlife activist, Sharon Hoole, requesting CITES to investigate unlawful permitting.

Brett Mitchell of the Elephant Reintegration Trust says that without a well-planned and costly reintegration programme “the likelihood of these calves surviving on their own (in the wild) or finding their family groups again is extremely low and they’re unlikely to be accepted into another wild herd.”

At the upcoming CITES 18th meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP 18) in August, Zimbabwe, , Namibia and South Africa, are proposing that their elephants remain listed as Appendix II (which allows trade in trophies, animal products, ivory – and live animals), but removing the current restrictions limiting This means that while elephants in all other African range states remain on Appendix I which does not allow the trade of ivory and live elephants “for primarily commercial purposes”, these countries are requesting unrestricted trade in elephants.

This article was first published by iol.co.za on 8 August 2019.


What you can do

Support ‘Fighting for Wildlife’ by donating as little as $1 – It only takes a minute. Thank you.

 

 

Fighting for Wildlife supports approved wildlife conservation organizations, which spend at least 80 percent of the money they raise on actual fieldwork, rather than administration and fundraising. When making a donation you can designate for which type of initiative it should be used – wildlife, oceans, forests or climate.

 

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 818
    Shares


Facebook Comments

13
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
Karin Andersson

I am Bloody angry, two small elephants end up in a zoo in US. How is it possible? I belived trade with wild animal is forbidden. It should stop!!

Alison Moanique

animal abuse is very often just the first step toward abuse of humans. stop it now.

Vicky Humbarger

leave them alone let them be in their families let them be with their mother we are losing our animals too fast too soon leave the wild

Lily Harper

Why bring them
Here??? They deserve a sanctuary

dogluvrgolden
dogluvrgolden

SHAME on the United States Zimbabwe, and all countries who import elephants !!!

Charlene Trimble

They are not MERCHANDISE!! Stop the exploitation of wildlife.

Diane
Diane

Outrageous!! Baby elephants should not be separated from their mothers or their herds. They should be left in their natural environment if they are to thrive. Once again, humans and money override what nature intended. I feel sad for the elephants and despise the humans that are doing this.

Tami Miller

Every animal on this planet DESERVES to live the life they were BORN to live, not the life humans MAKE them live.

Karen Lyons Kalmenson

Another disgusting example of humans cruel and beyond stupid

Roy Ravioli Buxton

Eats, shoots and leaves.

Sue Curtis

LEAVE ALL THE ANIMALS ALONE!!!!

Hilary Morrison

That should not be allowed to happen, please will the right people step in to stop this.

Marilyn Ashman

What a shock!!. How did this happen and who Authorized this Insanity!!??. I am so Pissed in hearing this!!.