POLL: Should California’s wild horses be sold to slaughter houses?

  • 553
    Shares


For the first time in many years, this month the U.S. government plans to capture nearly 1,000 federally protected wild horses in Devil’s Garden Plateau, a 258,000-acre area inside Northern ’s Modoc National Forest.

This is the largest herd of wild horses in the United States. The US Forest Service, which manages the land, initiated what it’s calling the “horse gather” because it says the animals have exceeded their population limit.

There are currently about 3,900 horses living in an area meant to accommodate up to 400 of the animals. The horses are consuming vegetation and water, leaving little for other wild animals, according to a statement from Modoc National Forest Supervisor Amanda McAdams.

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons

About 700 of the wild horses to be captured are either pregnant or under 10 years old. They will be sent to a Bureau of Land Management (BLM) adoption facility and will hopefully find new homes. But the remaining 300 or so horses will be offered for sale at a temporary holding facility. The ones that are still there after 30 days will be sold for just a dollar each.

Animal welfare organizations including the (HSUS) and the American Campaign (AWHC), along with Sen. Dianne Feinstein, oppose the roundup. They are rightfully concerned that buyers of the $1 horses will ship them off to slaughterhouses in Canada and Mexico.

In an Oct. 9 letter to acting Forest Service Chief Vicki Christiansen, Feinstein requested the “horse gather” be halted until the chief could answer some important questions: how was the wild horse population determined? How will the safety of the horses be ensured when they’re captured? How will the Forest Service help the horses find new homes? Can Christiansen certify that none of the horses will be sold to slaughterhouse buyers?

The Forest Service is taking advantage of a legal loophole that could result in the of the horses, according to the AWHC. Unlike the BLM, the Forest Service is not prohibited from selling wild horses for . Previous administrations have followed the BLM rules — but not the current one, which is “radically changing the policy,” the AWHC says.

The real reason for the “horse gather,” according to the AWHC, is to replace the wild horses with cattle belonging to ranchers who pay the government a fee for grazing permits.

“It’s a sad irony that the first federally protected wild horses in decades to be purposefully sold by the government for slaughter will come from California — a state where the cruel practice of horse slaughter has been banned since the 1990s,” Suzanne Roy, executive director of the AWHC, said in a statement. She said the plan sets “a horrific precedent that violates the intent of Congress, the spirit of the Wild Free Roaming Horses and Burros Act, and the overwhelming will of Californians and other Americans.”

As a better alternative, the AWHC urged the Forest Service to remove the herd in smaller increments to assure they can be humanely re-homed. This is not possible, Modoc County Farm Advisor Laura Snell argued, because with a population growth of up to 25 percent, as many as 1,000 wild horses would be born on the Devil’s Garden this year.

Another way to manage the population growth is to use an immunocontraceptive vaccine on mares. “The vaccine can be delivered remotely via darting, or by hand injection after horses have been humanely gathered via bait ,” the AWHC notes. It has no effect on the fetuses of pregnant mares and doesn’t impact hormones that drive natural behaviors.

Reducing the wild horse population via sterilization, however, is not a humane option. Doing so “takes the wild out of wild horses by destroying the wild free-roaming behaviors that distinguish wild horses from their domestic counterparts,” says the AWHC. Spaying mares is an especially dangerous procedure. The AWHC and other animal welfare groups are currently suing the the BLM for performing cruel sterilization surgeries on wild mares in Oregon.


In October 2016, the HSUS warned that a Trump presidency would be “a threat to animals everywhere.” Sadly, two years later, the “horse gather” in California is just one more example of how this prediction has come true.

For information about adopting one of these or other captured wild horses, go to the BLM’s Wild Horse and Burro Online Corral website.

This article was first published by Care2.com on 11 Oct 2018.


We invite you to share your opinion whether California’s wild horses should be sold to slaughter houses? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should California's wild horses be sold to slaughter houses?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.


Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop . By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 553
    Shares


Facebook Comments

10
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
mfrazier74@hotmail.com

The sad fact is that even this article uses the Forest Service’s “count” of wild horses in this area as truth! Considering the relatively small number of horses that have been rounded up after several days – its extremely doubtful that there are “3,900” wild horses as they say. The other consideration is that altho there are “too many” wild horses here – the number of AMLs for COWS is 5,000 to 6,000! The grazing allotment program that allows this is also PAID FOR BY US – the taxpayers! We shell out about 500 million dollars to subsidize this industry… Read more »

Cydney Thompson
Cydney Thompson

Did you catch the part written where the group asked that the removals occurred in smaller increments? The response was… oh no… like they could have up to 1000 more foals…. I didn’t think that math sounded quite right.

Lois Carol Wessels

Please vote on websit- thank you!e

Cheryl Dean

Nooooooooooo

Karen Lyons Kalmenson

Yo homo crapiens our fellow beings are just that, not menu choices

Tonia Vassila

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Marilyn Ashman

Are these Polls of any use to their Welfare?

Moose Martin
Moose Martin

At least someone is trying to save our wildlife. It beats sitting around whining and doing nothing, which is what most people do until it is too late.

Gaye Horn

NO