POLL: Should the use of animal fur in fashion clothing be banned?

  • 284

This week, a major apparel company announced that it’s going to be removing fur, angora and exotic leather from its supply chain.

The name VF Corporation might not sound familiar, but it’s the parent company to more than two dozen major brands, including The North Face, Nautica, Timberland, Vans, JanSport, Reef and Wrangler.

The announcement follows the release of its first policy on animal-derived products that was developed in partnership with the (HSUS) and Humane Society International (HSI).

Photo credit: Thinkstock

“We commend VF for committing to stop using fur and other animal materials in their products,” said Kitty Block, vice president of HSI. “As a leader in the global apparel industry, VF’s policy sends an important message to the industry that animal suffering has no place in fashion.”

The move still leaves other products derived from animals, including leather, down and wool, but it’s a major step in the right direction and a sign the fashion industry is continuing to move towards cruelty-free alternatives.

“As we continue to promote the development of viable commercial substitutes to animal materials, this policy will help to ensure that the materials we use today are procured from sources that prioritize animal welfare and responsible business practices,” said Letitia Webster, VF’s Vice President of Global Corporate Sustainability.

In a blog post, HSUS President and CEO Wayne Pacelle noted there’s plenty of reason to be optimistic about changes within the industry. One of VF’s companies based in Europe has already developed an alternative to down, and the latest announcement sends a clear message that alternatives are the future.

“There has been a trend within the fashion industry in recent years of switching to humane alternatives. Last year, Armani announced it would go fur-free. Brands and designers like Hugo Boss, Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger, Stella McCartney, and Ralph Lauren have also disassociated themselves from and switched to cruelty-free alternatives that are indistinguishable from the real thing. The HSUS and HSI continue to talk with companies to point them toward the humane economy , and today’s announcement is one of the most important,” he wrote.

The move also follows major victories to ban fur in cities in the U.S., including West Hollywood and Berkeley, Calif., which just made it official last month. Hopefully more companies will step up to protect millions of fur bearers and other animals who are needlessly used in fashion by making similar changes, and more will continue to develop alternatives to animal products that are made from truly eco-friendly and sustainable materials.

In the meantime, you can find stores around the world that have committed not to sell fur at the Fur Free Alliance’s Fur Free Retailer.

This article was first published by Care2.com on 10 May 2017.

We invite you to share your opinion whether the use of animal fur in fashion clothing should be banned? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should the use of animal fur in fashion clothing be banned?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop . By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.


Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter




Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 284

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Linda Reber
Linda Reber


Rosemarie Ehrenberg
Rosemarie Ehrenberg


Jennifer Rescuepaws Carnahan


Nkirote Christine

Use of animal fur should have been banned years ago!!!!

Elsa Byleveldt

For sure

Pepe Gutierrez

Hell yes

Vijay Kumar Shukla


Jenny Borus

Ban it for good

Theresa Kemp

We need to be educated again, taught in schools from an early age, the difference between good and bad, right and wrong. Place into history the reasons for why animal skins were used back then because there was nothing else but now there is. Teach why these days some still people still kill for fashion, fun and potions, purely through greed, selfishness, ignorance and long outdated tradition and nothing more. Mindless cruelty. None of it is necessary anymore. None of it! We are supposed to be evolved and educated beings. Seems many are far from this even now 🙁

Ann Marie Mullins


Donna Williford Otto


DeborahMae Broad


Wally Mcdonald

Anyone agreeing to this never buy leather shoes again. We are all responsible!

Sys J. Summer

on 80’s the fur was fashion and before this fever, was substitute for synthetic. We have take care that never comes, ever!China is now the big factory of furs. BAN China! What problems with people on change for synthetic? YES!

Ioana Pantelimon


Tracy Whitcomb

Yes. Absolutely.

Laurajo McNaughton



I congratulate the VC Corporation for removing fur from their clothing lines – this is wonderful and many animals will be saved from torture because of their decision – People have to be made aware that when they wear fur or products made from fur – they are responsible for animals being killed to get that fur – We need to be more vocal in this and let people know that wearing fur is not OK

Karen Lyons Kalmenson

fur belongs on whom it was born,
not by the vain and frivolous,