You see a jaw-dropping wildlife photo: A lion roaring, a hummingbird mid-flight or a fox leaping through snowy fields. It looks glamorous from the outside. But what nobody tells you is about the hours, days, even years spent just waiting around, motionless, hoping for that one shot.
Behind every gorgeous photo is a stretch of dead time that never makes it into the caption. Imagine sitting in a hide for six hours with nothing but silence, waiting for a bird who never actually shows. Or checking a camera trap for the 40th time in a month, only to catch a raccoon waddling past at 3 a.m. That long wait? That’s the real job. The shot you finally get, that’s just the payoff when luck decides to show up.
But for people who genuinely love wildlife photography, that waiting isn’t a waste. It’s part of the deal, it’s baked into the craft. Which brings up a pretty fair question: What do you do while sitting motionless inside a blind for hours, hoping something wanders into view?
The waiting is the whole job
Patience isn’t some bonus skill in wildlife photography, it’s the bare minimum. Take Wim van den Heever, a South African photographer who literally spent ten years trying to capture one image: A brown hyena slipping through the ruins of an abandoned Namibian mining town. That photo, “Ghost Town Visitor”, finally scored him the top prize at the Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition in 2025. The contest that year saw a record-shattering 60,636 entries from photographers in 113 countries and territories. Ten years for one shot.
Camera traps take that idea even further. The photographer doesn’t even have to be present when the shot finally happens. The routine is simple: Strap a remote camera to a tree or stake it near a water hole. Then you just walk away and wait for days or weeks, hoping something interesting strolls by.
How photographers kill the hours
So, what do you do during all that empty time? If you’re in a hide, you might bring a book or a journal, maybe use a half-charged laptop to edit older photos, or just sit back and observe everything that isn’t your “target” species. Some people bring flasks of coffee and snacks, turning it into an all-day stakeout with creature comforts. Others use the downtime to plan their next shot or scout out fresh locations for another go.
Sports have quietly become popular too, especially when it comes to filling that dead time. A radio or phone playing a match in the background gives your brain something to track without taking your eyes off the scene. You’ll find more and more betting apps tucked alongside the usual field gear: Binoculars, spare batteries and energy bars. Apps like the soccer Betway section make it easy: Fixtures, live odds and scores, all a tap away and easy to follow without taking yourself out of the moment for more than a few seconds. Is it as rewarding as watching actual wildlife? No, but it’s a harmless way to keep your brain busy when the world refuses to cooperate.
Waiting back at home
Now, if you’re more of a camera-trap photographer, the story is different. There’s no scene to watch live, so the waiting happens back at home or while you’re running errands or going about daily life. Take Randy Robbins, he spends much of his time documenting wildlife with remote camera setups. He summed up his approach in his 2025 highlights.
The work needs serious patience. Most of the time, the memory card’s a bust: Dozens or hundreds of shots and almost none of them worth sharing in a competition. But every so often, something amazing pops up, and it feels worth it. This kind of waiting happens away from the camera, just waiting for the day you get to hike back in and see what shows up.
Real stories from the field
And every photographer’s wait plays out differently. Over in Tasmania, Charles Davis spent a month with a camera trap aimed at a single branch, hoping to capture quolls, a kind of small, carnivorous marsupial. He never saw a single quoll, but a mother brushtail possum and her joey started showing up day after day, munching on leaf buds and hunting for insects right in front of his camera. That shot ended up making the shortlist for the Natural History Museum People’s Choice Award in 2026: A nice surprise, and proof that sometimes the substitute is better than the plan.
On the other hand, Robbins’s 2025 year-in-review puts the numbers into perspective: After a whole year of setting up and checking camera traps, he chose just 16 photos worth sharing from 365 days of effort. 16 selects in a year isn’t bad, but it really underlines how much of the work is spent waiting, not shooting.
Leave a Reply