Despite being banned since the 1970s, DDT and PCBs are still affecting wildlife today, particularly the California condor, a critically endangered species. The condors feed on dead marine life along the California coast that often contain higher amounts of contaminants compared to marine life elsewhere.
Scientists at San Diego State University (SDSU) and San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance (SDZWA), in collaboration with Centro de Investigación Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada and the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), conducted research and found that dead marine life along California’s coast had about seven times more DDT and 3.5 times as much PCBs compared to dead marine life near Baja California, Mexico.
The findings, published in Environmental Science & Technology, showed that California condors living in coastal areas of the state had higher levels of contaminants in their blood compared to inland condors, which do not feed on marine life. DDT levels in coastal condors were about seven times higher than inland condors, and PCBs were about 40 times higher.
The researchers further found over 400 contaminants in total in the marine life samples, which are a common food source for the condors.
“This kind of broad survey of contaminants shows us that the condors and the marine mammals have a multitude of contaminants that have never really been examined before, especially in detail,” explained study co-author Nathan Dodder, an analytical chemist and research scientist in the School of Public Health at SDSU and the SDSU Research Foundation. “The non-targeted contaminant analysis we used not only identifies known legacy contaminants, but has the added advantage of identifying novel contaminants, in addition to known but less-examined contaminants that are not routinely screened.”
DDT (dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane) was banned in 1972, and PCBs (polychlorinated biphenyls) were banned in 1979. But since these endocrine-disrupting chemicals do not easily or quickly break down, they still persist in the environment. For condors, these contaminants have been linked to the thinning of egg shells, causing reproductive disruption in the critically endangered species.
In 2021, scientists found at least 27,000 barrels laced with DDT off the coast of California, as DDT waste was formerly dumped into the oceans. This chemical, formerly a widely used pesticide, was banned due to its negative environmental impacts and threats to public health.
In the 1980s, the California condor was nearly extinct, with just 22 individuals remaining. A captive breeding program has helped the species recover and return to the wild, but these birds are still vulnerable to several threats, including lead poisoning and electrocution from power lines. The high levels of contaminants in condors around the California coastline raises further concern, and more research is needed for some of the other contaminants, aside from DDT and PCBs, that were found in the study.
“These findings can help inform management of the Baja flock as it continues to grow,” noted co-author Christopher Tubbs, associate director of reproductive sciences at SDZWA. “Some of the contaminants present in marine mammal samples that we collected are ‘unknown’ in terms of their structure and potential to disrupt hormone function. This study exclusively looked at one hormone pathway, estrogen, but many of the contaminants identified are well known to interfere with multiple hormone pathways. These warrant further study.”
This article by Paige Bennett was first published by EcoWatch on 19 May 2022. Lead Image: A California condor flies along the Big Sur coast. Mark Miller Photos / Stockbyte / Getty Images.
What you can do
Support ‘Fighting for Wildlife’ by donating as little as $1 – It only takes a minute. Thank you.
Fighting for Wildlife supports approved wildlife conservation organizations, which spend at least 80 percent of the money they raise on actual fieldwork, rather than administration and fundraising. When making a donation you can designate for which type of initiative it should be used – wildlife, oceans, forests or climate.
Leave a Reply