POLL: Are nature laws a reason for UK to stay in the EU?

  • 36
    Shares


Prime Minister David Cameron has come out in support of the EU’s Nature Directives, citing environmental conservation as a big reason citizens should vote to remain in the EU in the national referendum on 23 June.

“EU membership underpins many crucial environmental protections in the UK, while amplifying our voice in the world on vital issues like cutting global emissions,” said UK Prime Minister David Cameron.

His stress on the importance of EU nature laws to the UK is supported by two of the UK’s leading environmental NGOs – the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB, BirdLife in the UK) and WWF UK – which say remaining in the is safer for Britain’s .

European Turtle Dove Streptopelia turtur arenicola – adult

In a joint article published in The Telegraphon Thursday, Mike Clarke (CEO of RSPB) and David Nussbaum (CEO of WWF UK) make the case that EU nature laws – namely the Birds and Habitats Directives – have delivered significant protections for the environment and allowed the UK to contribute at the highest levels to the battle against climate change. They add that leaving the EU would cause “years of uncertainty” for the state of Britain’s environment and “The safer option for our wildlife and environment is for the UK toremain within the EU”.

“This referendum is a once in a generation decision, and it is vital that we hear from every sector on the possible implications for our country. Charities like the RSPB and WWF play an important role in the debate on Europe and I welcome their declaration that our natural environment will be safer if we stay in a reformed EU,” said Cameron.

In advance of the national referendum on 23 June on whether Britain should stay in the EU (‘#Brexit’), the RSPB and WWF UK, which have a total of about 1.7 million supporters, will inform them why they believe that nature and our environment are safer in Europe.

An independent report commissioned by the RSPB, the Wildlife Trusts and WWF illustrated how EU regulations have protected birds such as the Bittern, Nightjar and Dartford Warbler. EU standards have ensured UK citizens benefit from cleaner water, air and beaches. EU laws have also prevented the destruction of beautiful natural landscapes at the expense of infrastructure.

“The outcome of this referendum will have profound implications for our countryside, wildlife, rivers and seas. David Cameron is right to put the environment at the top of the agenda today, and he has highlighted the range of benefits that EU membership has delivered for our species and habitats,” said WWF’s Nussbaum. “Nature doesn’t observe national boundaries but still needs protection.”

His words were echoed by RSPB’s Mike Clarke. “We have always believed that, because nature transcends national boundaries, it needs cross-border co-operation to protect it and a common set of international standards that enable it to thrive. As the Prime Minister rightly points out, UK membership of the EU has benefitted nature and the environment in ways that would be hard to replicate if we left.”

“The RSPB will not be telling people how to vote, and we recognise that voters will be weighing up a range of issues when casting their votes on 23 June. However, we want a secure future for our most precious wildlife and the places they call home.”

Cameron’s support joins that of the national governments of Germany, Poland, Spain, France, Slovenia, Italy, Croatia, Luxembourg, Romania, Greece, Belgium, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Bulgaria and Hungary who have stressed the importance of protecting and better implementing the Birds and Habitats Directives.

Of course, simply remaining in the EU is not enough to save Britain’s nature. “… I will continue to press for change in Europe. I will use our seat at the table to ensure the natural environment, biodiversity and a living, working countryside are at the heart of agricultural policy through continued reform of the CAP; and that the Birds and Habitats Directives are maintained and better implemented, both in the UK and across Europe, to ensure the diversity of our countryside and wildlife,” Cameron said.

This article was first published by on 02 Jun 2016.


We invite you to share your opinion whether nature laws are a reason for UK to stay in the EU? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page:

Are nature laws a reason for UK to stay in the EU?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

 

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 36
    Shares


Facebook Comments

1
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
Vince Smith

Is Britain not capable of protecting it's own wildlife, of passing it's own laws?
This is just more bullshit aimed at brainwashing people who are unable to make up their own minds.

If we cannot take responsibility for our own countryside and wildlife, along with our own future, without relying on some European bureaucracy to tell us what to do, then I really think it is time we just gave up, roll over and die.