POLL: Should feral cats be slaughtered to save native animals?

  • 87
    Shares


The Australian government has pledged to kill two million feral cats and create new safe havens for native animals in an attempt to improve the fortunes of 20 mammal, 20 bird and 30 plant species that are at risk of extinction.

Federal environment minister, Greg Hunt, unveiled a five-year threatened species strategy at Melbourne zoo on Thursday, promising to “halt and reverse the threats to our magnificent endemic species”.

The first 10 mammal species identified for priority action are the numbat, mala, mountain pygmy-possum, greater bilby, golden bandicoot, brush-tailed rabbit-rat, eastern bettong, western quoll, Kangaroo Island dunnart and eastern barred bandicoot.Kookaburra and magpie among Australian birds in decline, says report.

Numbats are among the Australian mammal species considered under threat. Photograph: AAP

A further two – the leadbeater’s possum, Victoria’s faunal emblem that was recently listed as critically endangered, and the central rock rat – will get “emergency interventions”, Hunt said.

The environment minister, who announced the bird species that will receive help on Wednesday, said that two million feral cats, a major cause of native mammal and bird declines, will be wiped out “humanely” by 2020.

A total of 10 new feral cat-free enclosures will be established, with $750,000 spent, creating one of the largest fenced habitat areas in the Northern Territory. Meanwhile, cats will be targeted in a further 10m hectares of open landscape.

Hunt said that all of the states and territories have agreed to list the feral cat as a harmful pest, with the animal targeted through baiting, shooting and poisoning.

Just $6.6m has been dedicated to the strategy, with the majority of the money focused on cat eradication. Private donations may be required to fund 20 proposed plans, which include the expansion of the breeding population of the numbat in Western Australia and the extermination of feral cats on Kangaroo Island in South Australia.

Despite habitat loss being the primary threat to most of Australia’s endangered animals, the new strategy commits to “revegetate” existing habitats, rather than ensure they are completely off limits to developments such as mining and housing.

Australia has one of the worst extinction records in the world, losing 29 mammal species since European arrival on the continent. Feral cats, altered fire regimes, the expansion of the agriculture industry and other pests and weeds have been cited as reasons why nearly 1,800 species are nationally listed as being under threat.

“We are drawing a line in the sand today which says ‘on our watch, in our time, no more species extinction’,” Hunt said. “It’s tough, it’s a challenge, we can do much and we can do better.

“We can do a lot but we can do most if it’s a combination of the commonwealth states and community together.”


Asked about the funding, Hunt said: “What I’d like to see is additional funding from others. The whole idea here is putting out a prospectus. There are other projects we want to encourage. We want to encourage with this prospectus private, philanthropic, NGO and state and territory additional support.”

The strategy was announced at a threatened species summit that featured speeches from John Berry, the US ambassador to Australia, who praised Australia’s “leadership position” on conservation.

Maggie Barry, New Zealand’s minister for conservation, also spoke, calling the efforts to combat feral animals, such as possums and stoats in New Zealand, a “war”.

Environment groups broadly welcomed the federal government’s new strategy, although some questioned the level of funding committed to the plan and also the lack of any stricter controls on habitat loss.

“This strategy’s four actions areas – tackling feral cats, providing safe havens for species at risk, improving habitat and intervening to avert extinctions – are commendable,” said Kelly O’Shanassy, chief executive of the Australian Conservation Foundation.

“The strategy does fall significantly short in a number of areas. Threatened species recovery work is run on the smell of an oily rag. New money announced today is welcome, but funding remains inadequate. We urge the government to commit more.

“The strategy also fails to meaningfully address the biggest threat to threatened species and ecological communities – the loss and fragmentation of habitat – either through investment in new protected areas or by safeguarding existing critical places.”

The Places You Love alliance, a group of more than 40 environment and community groups, also gave the plan a cautious welcome but urged Hunt to ditch a plan to create “one-stop shops” that would devolve environmental approvals to the states.

“Our legal analysis clearly demonstrates that currently no state or territory major project assessment process that may affect listed threatened species meets the standards necessary for accreditation by the federal government,” said Glen Klatovsky, director of the Places You Love alliance.

“We believe that the ‘one-stop shop’ process will chronically reduce environmental standards and cause irreparable harm to our most critically endangered species and habitats.”

This article was first published by the Guardian on 16 Jul 2015.

We invite you to share your opinion whether feral cats should be slaughtered to save native animals? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page:

Should feral cats be slaughtered to save native animals?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

 

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 87
    Shares


Facebook Comments

14
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
Leigh Lofgren

horrific and makes me ashamed to be an Australian

Helga Lehman

Other birds, airplaines, hunters, enviroment, solarwindmills, sonar panels on houses, sickness etc that kill other animals. I believe you are are very nasty human being, Carol Ann Davies. By they way if you have cats you have 30% less chance of having a stroke and 40% less chance of having a heart attack. Dogs had 0% benifit. There was a 10 year study done in Minnesota. Hope you rot in he2hockeysticks.

Susan Frudd

Australia should take a good look at their record regarding loss of species and habitats, I think the feral cats are scapegoats. Cats will always hunt it is in their genes right from the lions to the domestic cats to the ferals who hunt to survive…does not help the birds I know, sadly humankind are also to blame they thinks cats are disposable and just throw them out, that's why we have so many strays…..keeping indoors after being spayed or neutered ….the answer for feral and domestic cats is just cull them….sadly……….

Nina Stavlund

Slaughter anything will never ever work. We know this now. What have to happen is a catch, neuter and release program. I know this works as I lead a program like this with the Norwegian Animal Protection Organization. But, this is not enough. Also, pet owners have to learn that their neutered cat can just as well live a happy life inside the house, and does not have to go outside (if your cat is used to this solution, or teach it from day 1 in the new home). We need responsible pet owners, and unfortunately, we humans still have… Read more »

Karen Lyons Kalmenson

far too many cats are feral because of human carelessness, cruelty and/or ignorance…they should not be punished for that which is not their fault…keep your cats indoors, neuter/spay, adopt…trap, neuter/spay/release, and feed the ferals in your neighborhood so hunger does not force them to kill birds and other wild animals. killing solves NADA!!!

Brenda Robinson

No animal should be slaughtered! There is always another way, find that and use it. We ALL want to live!

Linda French

Further to my other comment, I do agree that culling is not the answer, spaying programs and educating people to keep cats inside.

Linda French

Helen Wood I disagree with you. We turned cats into domestic animals and there fore have the responsibility to look after them, and keep them indoors, not run loose. People need to be educated about what happens when you allow run loose not netured or spayed. They can also have a very short life, cruel death, and are also hunted. Cats kill BILLIONS OF BIRDS

Mark McCandlish

I'd like to add my point of view, because I have actually worked with two or three charitable organizations or non-profit foundations to resolve exactly this issue in my local area of northern California. It is not necessary to kill the feral cats to reduce their numbers and protect wildlife, and I know this because I have done this very thing. I work for a non-profit feral cat rescue facility in Palo Cedro, called the Assisi Sanctuary, a 501(c)(3) foundation. This organization had its origins in the same problem facing Australia right now: an exploding feral cat population that was… Read more »

Carol Ann Davies

This cull needs to happen worldwide. New Zealand wildlife is suffering through this TNR policy which is a SPCA policy. Boycott the RSPCA and they might get the message

Helen Wood

Cats are not human designed pets. Even in law, they are considered wild animals who choose to associate with humans. They have as much right to be in the wild as anyone else.

Helen Wood

Let me simplify this for you. Any time the question is "Should ___________ be killed?" the answer is no. Human beings are very good at wiping out species, which is why the world has lost so much. We should be curbing our instinct to kill anything we find annoying, not looking around for new victims.

Mikal Deese

And not only in Australia! Trap, neuter, and release programs to "save the cats" only shift the killing to wildlife. Domestic cats are human designed pets that do not belong in the wild anywhere.