The death of a bald eagle—a national symbol—in the U.S. capital has stirred a wider debate about potential impacts of lead bullets and other sources of harmful metals in the environment, especially given a recent ruling by the federal government.
When veterinarians in Washington, D.C., took in a bald eagle on Tuesday, it was already in the advanced stages of lead poisoning. The animal had been reportedly picked up in Nanjemoy, Maryland, by an area police officer, who told the Washington Post the bird was sitting only 100 feet from a rural road.
Once at City Wildlife, an animal treatment center, tests revealed high levels of lead in the bird’s system. Despite efforts to expel the toxic substance, the bird died late Wednesday night. The bird had shown no physical indications of lead poisoning aside from unusual behavior.
According to Kristy Jacobus, one of the women who treated the bird, it’s the third eagle the center has seen this year but the only one treated for lead.
“It’s not uncommon,” she said for the center to treat lead-poisoned birds. But more often, they deal with pigeons that ingest lead at construction sites. Eagles, however, tend to ingest lead when they consume animals that have been shot with lead bullets.
Without more situational evidence, it’s nearly impossible to say exactly where the eagle came into contact with lead. But most often, they encounter the toxic element when they scavenge for food. After hunters shoot an animal, they tend to gut it, leaving the innards out in the open. These “gut piles,” as they’re referred to, then attract scavenging eagles.
Lead poisoning tends to take several days or weeks. Some eagles ingest the lead-filled remains of several animals before succumbing.
How Populations Are Impacted Today
So, is this eagle a canary in a coal mine?
Exactly how many eagles or other raptors succumb to lead poisoning and where they’re being poisoned is unclear. For every bird of prey that’s brought into a treatment center, more die unnoticed in the wild. As bald eagle populations rebound from historic lows, the sheer number of eagles people come into contact with is also rising. Just this week, populations in Wisconsin reached record highs.
“We don’t have a good idea about the magnitude of the problem,” said EJ Williams from the American Bird Conservancy. “It’s a real case-by-case basis.”
In California, for example, condors were severely impacted by the use of lead ammunition. The birds were regularly consuming lead-contaminated remains of hunted animals, and their population struggled to grow.
To combat this, the state outlawed lead ammunition in hunting in 2013, in a requirement that will phase in gradually until 2019.
How Populations Could be Impacted in the Future
Earlier this year, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke reversed an Obama-era rule banning lead ammunition on wildlife refuges.
Lead-free bullets are typically more expensive, and those opposing the bill argued that hunting would become less accessible for lower income hunters. Banning lead bullets also touched a cultural nerve among pro-gun groups that oppose any roadblocks to using firearms.
Scientist and wildlife conservationists, however, have long been calling for a lead bullet ban. In 2013, a group of scientists collectively released a statement warning that lead bullets could have yet-to-be-seen and unknown consequences in the future. Lead ammunition currently amounts to the second most used source of lead in the U.S. and frequently discharges the toxic substance into the environment.
In their statement, the scientists noted that lead bullet fragments can poison birds and people that eat contaminated meat.
Today, there’s not enough evidence to prove how and to what extent using lead ammunition on wild lands will impact wildlife in the future.
“A lot of refuges have eagle populations,” said Williams, though she noted that park officials often choose internally to forgo lead ammunition.
This article was first published by National Geographic on 08 Dec 2017.
We invite you to share your opinion whether there should be a universal ban on the use of lead ammunition? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.
Thank you for voting.
Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.
Share this post with your friends
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should the UK finally abandon its controversial badger cull? – [2170 Views]
- POLL: Should fox hunting legislation be repealed in the UK? – [2168 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of Grizzly Bears be banned nationwide? – [2013 Views]
- Arctic Fox and Snowy Owl Filmed Doing Strange ‘Dance’ – But Why? – [1838 Views]
- POLL: Should Japan be sanctioned for slaughtering dolphins and whales? – [1424 Views]
- How Sea Shepherd lost battle against Japan’s whale hunters in Antarctic – [1267 Views]
- POLL: Should We Revive Extinct Species? – [1117 Views]
- POLL: Should the Cheetah be classified as “Endangered”? – [1113 Views]
- POLL: Should Lolita the Lonely Orca be Freed? – [1054 Views]
- It’s a Miracle! Wisdom Lays an Egg at Age 67 – [1038 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should hunting with hounds be banned? – [7733 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [4787 Views]
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farming? – [4251 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of bears and wolves be banned? – [4057 Views]
- POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3799 Views]
- POLL: Should Japan be sanctioned for slaughtering dolphins and whales? – [3285 Views]
- POLL: Should the slaughter of badgers in the UK be finally stopped? – [3077 Views]
- POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2873 Views]
- POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2667 Views]
- POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2578 Views]