POLL: Should there be an EU-wide domestic ivory ban?

  • 142

The EU has traditionally been a global leader in tackling the problem of wildlife and in encouraging other countries to take action. Last year it published a far-reaching Action Plan against Wildlife , which set out a comprehensive list of actions to address the problem.

So why is it dragging its heels when it comes to saving elephants and closing its domestic market?

The statistics make for depressing reading. One study led by the Wildlife Conservation Society showed a 65 percent decline in Central African forest elephants between 2002 and 2013, and the 2016 Great Elephant Census showed a 30 percent decline in savannah elephants between 2007 and 2014.

Elephant poaching for the illegal is nothing new but has soared in recent years. Photo credit: Charles Foley/WCS.

One study led by the Wildlife Conservation Society showed a 65 percent decline in Central African forest elephants between 2002 and 2013. Photo credit: WCS Congo.

Sales of ivory within the EU are subject to controls but are still permitted, with restrictions, for ‘old’ ivory items. Such restrictions are challenging to enforce as new ivory from recently killed elephants is indistinguishable from old ivory without detailed DNA analysis.

The existence of legal ivory markets thereby provides a loophole through which newly poached illegal ivory can be laundered; this is an ongoing problem. The only way to ensure illegal ivory can’t enter the marketplace is by closing down legal domestic markets.

Those not in favor of closing down the EU’s market argue that it is well regulated and the isn’t a significant problem. However, without any comprehensive data on the we can’t be sure of the scale of the problem. We can, however, assume that as the EU is the world’s largest exporter of legal ivory, the is likely to be significant. Furthermore, EU leadership on this issue is critical.

WCS president and CEO Cristian Samper kneels by a recently poached elephant in ’s Niassa National Reserve. Photo credit: Alastair Nelson/WCS.

The EU’s slowness to tackle this issue is surprising given its strong track record in taking action on other issues and the support and financial assistance it has provided and continues to provide to other countries regarding both and other conservation issues. However, in terms of global action on ivory it is now lagging behind.

Last year the US adopted a near-total ban on domestic ivory sales and earlier this year China took strong steps towards closing its domestic market, which it has announced will be finalized by the end of 2017. Some countries within the EU such as France have also taken action, and recently the UK announced its intention to close its domestic ivory market as well.

The EU is currently running an online public consultation until the 8th December to gather views from citizens and stakeholders on this issue.

Today in Africa as many as 96 elephants are killed daily to fuel the global ivory trade. Photo credit: Julie Larsen Maher/WCS.

WCS has worked with other NGOs to prepare a guidance document for citizens to help respond to the consultation, which is available on the MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) for Wildlife website. We urge concerned citizens to take this opportunity to have their voices heard and hope that as a result the EU will finally take decisive action.

This article was first published by The Wildlife Conservation Society on 07 Dec 2017.

We invite you to share your opinion whether there should be an EU-wide domestic ivory ban? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should there be an EU-wide domestic ivory ban?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop . By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.


Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter



Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 142

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Chandra Kulupana

Voted YES

Marianne Thorsdatter Måsvær

YES!!!! Voted

Dorothy Ziegler

I can’t believe this topic is still being debated. There is absolutely no reason in the world for people to be purchasing “genuine” ivory…never has been. The shallow people who insist on “genuine” ivory have more money than common sense. I for one would like to know how many of these cruel heartless bastards can actually tell the difference between “genuine” and “faux” ivory? I’m guessing maybe 2. These elephants ( as with all animals) deserve to live their lives without having to fear the “human race” and feeding the ego’s of those “entitled” mother f*ckers who think their lives… Read more »

Theresa Kemp

This makes my blood boil. It is obvious that all kinds of poaching should be stopped. Animals, many of them moving fast towards extinction, are being killed for trinkets and treatments and these people need, somehow, to be educated for their ignorance. Maybe the threat that when these poachers are caught, their heads will be boiled for decoration and sold on with the proceeds going towards animal conservation.

Evelyn Ball

Sure doesn’t say much about our pathetic species when some think it is better to have worthless trinkets made from these animals instead of leaving them alive to live their lives as they should.

Arlene Labbe

Rhetorical question. LEAVE WILD ANIMALS ALONE! They do NOT belong to humans, period!!!

Juanita Cunningham