The EU has traditionally been a global leader in tackling the problem of wildlife trafficking and in encouraging other countries to take action. Last year it published a far-reaching Action Plan against Wildlife Trafficking, which set out a comprehensive list of actions to address the problem.
So why is it dragging its heels when it comes to saving elephants and closing its domestic ivory market?
The statistics make for depressing reading. One study led by the Wildlife Conservation Society showed a 65 percent decline in Central African forest elephants between 2002 and 2013, and the 2016 Great Elephant Census showed a 30 percent decline in savannah elephants between 2007 and 2014.
One study led by the Wildlife Conservation Society showed a 65 percent decline in Central African forest elephants between 2002 and 2013. Photo credit: WCS Congo.
Sales of ivory within the EU are subject to controls but are still permitted, with restrictions, for ‘old’ ivory items. Such restrictions are challenging to enforce as new ivory from recently killed elephants is indistinguishable from old ivory without detailed DNA analysis.
The existence of legal ivory markets thereby provides a loophole through which newly poached illegal ivory can be laundered; this is an ongoing problem. The only way to ensure illegal ivory can’t enter the marketplace is by closing down legal domestic markets.
Those not in favor of closing down the EU’s market argue that it is well regulated and the illegal trade isn’t a significant problem. However, without any comprehensive data on the illegal trade we can’t be sure of the scale of the problem. We can, however, assume that as the EU is the world’s largest exporter of legal ivory, the illegal trade is likely to be significant. Furthermore, EU leadership on this issue is critical.
WCS president and CEO Cristian Samper kneels by a recently poached elephant in Mozambique’s Niassa National Reserve. Photo credit: Alastair Nelson/WCS.
The EU’s slowness to tackle this issue is surprising given its strong track record in taking action on other wildlife trafficking issues and the support and financial assistance it has provided and continues to provide to other countries regarding both wildlife trafficking and other conservation issues. However, in terms of global action on ivory it is now lagging behind.
Last year the US adopted a near-total ban on domestic ivory sales and earlier this year China took strong steps towards closing its domestic market, which it has announced will be finalized by the end of 2017. Some countries within the EU such as France have also taken action, and recently the UK announced its intention to close its domestic ivory market as well.
The EU is currently running an online public consultation until the 8th December to gather views from citizens and stakeholders on this issue.
Today in Africa as many as 96 elephants are killed daily to fuel the global ivory trade. Photo credit: Julie Larsen Maher/WCS.
WCS has worked with other NGOs to prepare a guidance document for citizens to help respond to the consultation, which is available on the MEPs (Members of the European Parliament) for Wildlife website. We urge concerned citizens to take this opportunity to have their voices heard and hope that as a result the EU will finally take decisive action.
This article was first published by The Wildlife Conservation Society on 07 Dec 2017.
We invite you to share your opinion whether there should be an EU-wide domestic ivory ban? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.
Thank you for voting.
Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.
Share this post with your friends
You may also like:
Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days
- POLL: Should the UK finally abandon its controversial badger cull? – [2176 Views]
- POLL: Should fox hunting legislation be repealed in the UK? – [2168 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of Grizzly Bears be banned nationwide? – [2013 Views]
- Arctic Fox and Snowy Owl Filmed Doing Strange ‘Dance’ – But Why? – [1882 Views]
- How Sea Shepherd lost battle against Japan’s whale hunters in Antarctic – [1267 Views]
- POLL: Should We Revive Extinct Species? – [1117 Views]
- POLL: Should Lolita the Lonely Orca be Freed? – [1093 Views]
- It’s a Miracle! Wisdom Lays an Egg at Age 67 – [1038 Views]
- POLL: Should drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge be banned? – [1002 Views]
- POLL: Should Japan be sanctioned for slaughtering dolphins and whales? – [997 Views]
Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months
- POLL: Should hunting with hounds be banned? – [7733 Views]
- Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [4755 Views]
- POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farming? – [4278 Views]
- POLL: Should the trophy hunting of bears and wolves be banned? – [4061 Views]
- POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3799 Views]
- POLL: Should the slaughter of badgers in the UK be finally stopped? – [3077 Views]
- POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2873 Views]
- POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2667 Views]
- POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2578 Views]
- POLL: Should wild elephants be sold to Chinese zoos? [2322 Views]