POLL: Should Trump be allowed to destroy the Endangered Species Act

  • 188
    Shares


On May 19, we celebrate Endangered Species Day, but this year the Endangered Species Act (ESA) itself could become endangered.

Those opposing the ESA want to make it easier to develop anywhere — even in wilderness areas that encroach on crucial habitats.“‘States, counties, wildlife managers, home builders, construction companies, farmers, ranchers, and other stakeholders are all making it clear that the Endangered Species Act is not working today,’” said Senator John Barrasso (R- Wyoming), as quoted by the Los Angeles Times.

Barrasso is among the western Republicans who would like to turn federal land over to state control, supposedly because the states know best. But of course, that leaves open the door for private exploitation of public lands.

Photo Credit: thinkstock

“The usual argument against the act is roughly that it is not used to protect species, but to stifle development,”the LA Times editorial board explains. But history has shown that the Endangered Species Act does protect species.

The Importance of the Endangered Species Act

Desert tortoises, burrowing owls, tiger salamanders and mountain yellow-legged frogs are just a few of the endangered species my son has been involved in protecting under the ESA.

Whenever a utility company or a transit authority in California is proposing major work over a number of acres, they are required under the ESA to first hire wildlife biologists to check that no endangered species will be harmed.

There are numerous stories of creatures brought back from the brink of extinction, but probably the most famous is the bald eagle: In the early 1960s, the count of nesting bald eagles plummeted to about 480 in the lower 48 states. Today there are some 14,000 breeding pairs in the skies over North America, as testament to the importance of the ESA.

Another success story is that of the California Condor.

Photo Credit: BLM via Flickr California Condor

The California condor population declined during the 20th century until there were only 22 known to exist in the world. In 1987 the last of these condors were taken into captivity. There were no California condors in the wild between 1988 and 1991, but reintroduction efforts began in 1992 and continue today. As of May 2013, there are approximately 435 California condors in the world, about 237 of which are free-flying in California, Arizona and Baja California, Mexico.

How the Endangered Species Act is Under Attack

Since the 115th Congress was sworn in on January 3, 2017, at least 24 legislative attacks have been introduced seeking to strip federal protections from specific species or undercutting the Endangered Species Act. These attacks build on more than 230 pieces of legislation that attempted to weaken the Endangered Species Act since 2011, when the Republican Party took control of the House of Representatives.

As Randy Paynter, the founder of Care2, explains in his petition:

“House Natural Resources Committee Chairman Rob Bishop has said he “would love to invalidate” the law. Other Republican lawmakers would like to limit logging restrictions under the act, stop lawsuits to protect species, or force one species off the list for every species added to the list.”


Paynter adds:

“Additionally, salmon, walrus, wolverines and other important species would be at risk under a weakened ESA because the protection of their habitat is opposed by energy, mining, logging and agricultural industries.”

2,270 Endangered Or Threatened Species Under The ESA

Currently, there are around 2,270 species listed as endangered or threatened under the ESA, which was signed into law by President Nixon in 1973. It is worth noting that the act was approved by huge margins in both chambers; the House vote was an incredible 355-4. How times and the Republican party have changed.

These 2,270 included both animals and plants, species that have become so rare they are in danger of becoming extinct. Threatened species are plants and animals that are likely to become endangered throughout all or a significant portion of their range within the foreseeable future.

Why Is The ESA So Important?

Care2’s Robin Marty writes: “The Trump administration couldn’t make their intentions any more clear: They are prepared to poison both the land and the people of the U.S. if it means making donors a profit.

If Congress and President Trump gut this nature-protecting act, it would be calamitous for hundreds of plant and animal species, local ecosystems, and the complex interconnections that sustain the natural world.

We can’t let that happen.

We must stand up against the deadly fossil fuel industries and let our leaders know that we won’t back down.

If you agree, please sign and share this Care2 petition, demanding that Trump protect the Endangered Species Act.

This article was first published by Care2.com on 14 May 2017.


We invite you to share your opinion whether Trump should be allowed to destroy the Endangered Species Act. Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should Trump be allowed to destroy the Endangered Species Act

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.


Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

 

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 188
    Shares


Facebook Comments

14
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
Helene-Carole Soucy

No way!

Adelina Jaudal

never !

JazzyJoslynn Lamar

no it should not be allowed

Nickolas Haramis
Nickolas Haramis

As a Canadian perhaps I should keep my opinions to myself but the Republican president is hell bent on reversing years of work to save species at risk. And in so doing would become known as the President responsible for killing off the American Eagle and the symbol of America, land of the free.

Nickolas Haramis

Patricia Mazzoni

Absolutely NOT!!!

M Leybra
M Leybra

“The usual argument against the Endangered Species Act is roughly that it is not used to protect species, but to stifle development,” says the LA Times Ed. Board. In fact, these two issues are one & the same since habitat loss due to rampant human over-development & activity is the main threat leading to endangering all other non-human animal species.

Judith Bay

of course not 🙁

Phyllis Crawford

NEVER NO NO NO NO

Wally Mcdonald

I hate the way this site asks everything as a stupid question!

Maggie Bear

Nooooooooooo

Jeannie Mccandless

Why the two extremes? Teach people to live harmoniously with nature. It is unconstitutional for the feds to own land. You are twisting things.

Lindsay Leclair

No

Ann Marie Mullins

No