Vicious murdering bully chosen as Britain’s national bird

  • 72

So we’ve chosen a vicious murdering bully for our national bird?

It’s bad enough that we probably plumped for our self-important red-breasted friend because the Victorians sentimentalised the as a symbol of Christmas.

Yet I suspect that the main reason it has been chosen is because it’s the one bird most people can actually recognise.


‘Male robins will peck at rivals’ napes to sever their spinal cords; 10% of all adult robin deaths are robin-on-robin, red-on-red incidents.’ Photograph: Alamy

Couldn’t we have gone for something more imaginative? Where was the raven, for instance, that super-intelligent, glossy black gothic spirit of place, without which the Tower of London and the monarchy would fall? (Although that legend turns out to be another Victorian invention too, darn it).

As a fervent beach-bird botherer, I’d have opted for something truly symbolic of our island’s shores – such as the philopatric and glorious oystercatcher, with its resplendent red bill; the longest living wader, reaching up to 45 years old, a stalwart guardian of the British coastline. Or how about the cuckoo, the time-honoured signifier of spring and usurper of other birds’ nests – surely a suitable symbol of our colonial past?

It seems remiss to ignore the eider duck, too, since we can claim it as the first bird ever to be protected by law. Back in the 670s, St Cuthbert declared the eiders of the Farne Islands should be safe from predation and, presumably, would-be quilt-makers. This resolute sea duck with its outrageous pistachio-green neck also speaks to a camp British sense of humour, as anyone who’s ever heard its ah-ooo call will testify; it sounds exactly like Frankie Howerd.

In the interests of , we might have picked a more endangered bird (the estimates that there are more than six million breeding pairs of robins in the ). The humble house sparrow, for instance, a once common species whose drastically dwindling numbers could really do with the publicity. Or how about the feral pigeon or herring gull – street-smart birds far more in keeping with modern Britain?

But we’re stuck with the robin. True, it is embedded in our collective cultural memory, back to medieval times and perhaps beyond. In fact, we liked it so much that, up until the last century, we used to eat it – often in pies. Mark Cocker, in his wonderful Birds Britannica, waxes lyrical over a bird which got William Blake’s dander up: “A robin redbreast in a cage / puts all Heaven in a rage.” But Cocker also notes that the cheeky bird, which perches on my spade as I dig in the garden, has also long been considered a harbinger of death. Doesn’t sound so good now, does it?

Highly aggressive and territorial, that sweet song fluting from your fence is actually the avian equivalent of a foul-mouthed “get orf my land”. Males will peck at rivals’ napes to sever their spinal cords; 10% of all adult robin deaths are robin-on-robin, red-on-red incidents. They also launch unprovoked attacks on other, innocent species, lashing out with razor-sharp claws.

This ain’t no garden idyll, bro; it’s turf warfare. Even that pumped-up red chest has nothing to do with smoochy mating rituals. It’s solely a signal of being ready to ruck, a ruthless instinct to defend territory. Robins literally see red. When researching his revelatory book The Life of the Robin, in the 1930s, David Lack discovered his subjects would even go for stuffed robins or mere tufts of red feathers.

And you’re telling me this is a good role model for England? A hooligan bird that puffs up big, throws its weight about, jealously guards its patch and … Oh, right, I see what you mean now.

This article was first published by The Guardian on 11 Jun 2015.


Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter




Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 72

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
Mary Alice Petch-Pollard

Nature is nature, there is no other animal ( in the air, walking on the earth or swimming in the ocean ) that does to it's own kind and others, that what the human animal does. We are the most dangerous, and despicable of them all ! I still love the little Robin

Gordon Spears

Must birds now also conform to "modern" notions of political correctness?

Georgia Ashby

Wonderful photo!

Georgia Ashby

Amusing and well written. Thanks.

Ken Billington

We like robins because they will come very close to you without fear (but you will never catch one by hand) so it's very easy to take good close-up photos of robins. However, if robins never killed each other we would all be up to our bums in robins, so maybe that's nature's way of preventing overpopulation. Too bad that doesn't work for people also (Comment by David Wallace).

Wendé Anne Maunder

The author is the well-respected, British broadcaster and author, Philip Hoare, he know as thing or two more than most about wildlife. Information under the photo, credits it to 'Alamy' .

Jim Takahashi

Highly aggressive, invasive and territorial – perfectly symbolic of the British Empire.

Carol Duke

Oh, I see the name of the photographer . . . where it should be – right under the photo. The author's name is most likely here too.

Carol Duke

Clever and witty article. I had no idea that 'sweet' little bird that led Mary Lennox to the secret garden was so vicious. I have never read anything comparable in our American Robin. Of course, birds will fight for territory but to the death? I wonder who the author and photographer is of this piece?