Jun 172017
 

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

While animal advocates continue to work towards a world where animals aren’t used as test subjects in labs for any reason, there’s now renewed hope that the U.S. could soon end the senseless suffering caused by testing for cosmetics.

This week, members of Congress reintroduced the Humane Cosmetics Act, which will make it illegal to conduct or commission animal testing for finished products and ingredients, in addition to banning the import of products that have been tested elsewhere.

“The cruelty animals are subjected to during cosmetics testing is unacceptable―from lethal dose tests to irritation and force-feeding tests. Not only are these tests inhumane, but modern technology makes them unnecessary and overly expensive,” said Rep. Martha McSally.

“The cosmetics industry is already using alternative cutting edge testing methods that are safer, cheaper, and don’t hurt animals. It’s time the United States join the ranks of over 30 other countries in the developed world to stand against this vile practice. The inhumane treatment of animals serves no place in our society.”

Photo credit: Thinkstock.

Even though animal testing is not required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Product Safety Commission in the U.S., and despite the fact that alternatives to animal testing currently exist, many companies continue to test their products and ingredients on animals, while the FDA leaves it up to them to substantiate the safety of their own products and recalls are left entirely up to manufacturers.

More concerning is that even products that are labeled as “not tested on animals” or “cruelty-free” may, at the ingredient level or at certain stages of development, have been tested on animals by other companies,making it confusing and frustrating for people who are trying to make compassionate choices.

Because the Animal Welfare Act does not require that all laboratory animal use in the U.S. be reported we may never know exactly how many animals have needlessly suffered and died behind closed doors just for the sake of a new product, but numbers are estimated to be in the millions.

Fortunately, nations around the world are turning against the practice, and hundreds of companies have proven they can make safe products without causing harm.

Banning the practice will do more than just end the suffering of animals used in painful tests, it will also encourage the continued development and validation of more alternatives that are cheaper, faster and more reliable, in addition to helping cosmetics companies in the U.S. stay competitive in a global market that continues to move towards mandating cruelty-free alternatives.

According to lawmakers, out of the 13 biggest importers of cosmetics from the U.S., eight countries either already have bans on cosmetics tested on animals in place, or are considering legislation that would ban them.

“Congress should permanently end the painful and unnecessary process of testing cosmetics on animals in this country,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA). “The cosmetics industry already has safer, more cost effective methods of testing that do not harm animals. American companies face no economic risk from this legislation, which would also show moral leadership.”

This legislation already has bipartisan support lawmakers, and the endorsement of more than 195 cosmetics companies, but it needs our support.

TAKE ACTION!

Please show your support by signing and sharing the petition asking Congress to pass the Humane Cosmetics Act.

To find cruelty-free personal care products and cosmetics already on the market that have been certified by the Leaping Bunny program, check out Cruelty Free International.

This article was first published by Care2.com on 09 Jun 2017.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

 

Share this post with your friends

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  




Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

avatar
Pietje Plezier

I hope this is treu !!!

Darren Jessup

Then the US needs to work on a ban on animals like Trump !

Anne Grice

Hope this carries through to a ban.

M Leybra

Just read that L’Oreal Cosmetics has finally caved to give attention to a lab produced form of human skin to replace the live animals they still use. Yes, cosmetics testing is the least defensible use for animal abuse but every toxic substance in today’s world continues to be tested on animals.

Gwendoline Merrick

Good news!

wpDiscuz

Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days

  1. POLL: Should the MOTV trophy hunting channel be closed down? [1714 Views]
  2. POLL: Should the trophy hunting of lions be banned? [1568 Views]
  3. POLL: Should there be a tough crack down on the killing of raptors? [1241 Views]
  4. POLL: Should captivity for all killer whales be banned? [1211 Views]
  5. POLL: Should the keeping of dolphins in captivity be banned? [1189 Views]
  6. POLL: Should trophy hunting be banned? [1156 Views]
  7. POLL: Should elephants be kept in captivity? [1014 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the pangolin slaughter in Africa be banned? [883 Views]
  9. POLL: Should the culling of Scotland’s mountain hares be banned? [715 Views]
  10. POLL: Should Praying Mantises be used for pest control? [688 Views]

Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months

  1. POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farms? [16951 Views]
  2. Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [9305 Views]
  3. POLL: Should the sale of elephant ivory be legalized? [4084 Views]
  4. POLL: Should Congress disband Wildlife “Killing” Services? [4083 Views]
  5. POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3795 Views]
  6. POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2869 Views]
  7. POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2662 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2573 Views]
  9. POLL: Should wild elephants be sold to Chinese zoos? [2319 Views]
  10. POLL: Should Japan’s “research whaling” program be closed down? [2150 Views]