Jun 172017
 

While animal advocates continue to work towards a world where animals aren’t used as test subjects in labs for any reason, there’s now renewed hope that the U.S. could soon end the senseless suffering caused by testing for cosmetics.

This week, members of Congress reintroduced the Humane Cosmetics Act, which will make it illegal to conduct or commission animal testing for finished products and ingredients, in addition to banning the import of products that have been tested elsewhere.

“The cruelty animals are subjected to during cosmetics testing is unacceptable―from lethal dose tests to irritation and force-feeding tests. Not only are these tests inhumane, but modern technology makes them unnecessary and overly expensive,” said Rep. Martha McSally.

“The cosmetics industry is already using alternative cutting edge testing methods that are safer, cheaper, and don’t hurt animals. It’s time the United States join the ranks of over 30 other countries in the developed world to stand against this vile practice. The inhumane treatment of animals serves no place in our society.”

Photo credit: Thinkstock.

Even though animal testing is not required by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or the Product Safety Commission in the U.S., and despite the fact that alternatives to animal testing currently exist, many companies continue to test their products and ingredients on animals, while the FDA leaves it up to them to substantiate the safety of their own products and recalls are left entirely up to manufacturers.

More concerning is that even products that are labeled as “not tested on animals” or “cruelty-free” may, at the ingredient level or at certain stages of development, have been tested on animals by other companies,making it confusing and frustrating for people who are trying to make compassionate choices.

Because the Animal Welfare Act does not require that all laboratory animal use in the U.S. be reported we may never know exactly how many animals have needlessly suffered and died behind closed doors just for the sake of a new product, but numbers are estimated to be in the millions.

Fortunately, nations around the world are turning against the practice, and hundreds of companies have proven they can make safe products without causing harm.

Banning the practice will do more than just end the suffering of animals used in painful tests, it will also encourage the continued development and validation of more alternatives that are cheaper, faster and more reliable, in addition to helping cosmetics companies in the U.S. stay competitive in a global market that continues to move towards mandating cruelty-free alternatives.

According to lawmakers, out of the 13 biggest importers of cosmetics from the U.S., eight countries either already have bans on cosmetics tested on animals in place, or are considering legislation that would ban them.

“Congress should permanently end the painful and unnecessary process of testing cosmetics on animals in this country,” said Rep. Don Beyer (D-VA). “The cosmetics industry already has safer, more cost effective methods of testing that do not harm animals. American companies face no economic risk from this legislation, which would also show moral leadership.”

This legislation already has bipartisan support lawmakers, and the endorsement of more than 195 cosmetics companies, but it needs our support.

TAKE ACTION!

Please show your support by signing and sharing the petition asking Congress to pass the Humane Cosmetics Act.

To find cruelty-free personal care products and cosmetics already on the market that have been certified by the Leaping Bunny program, check out Cruelty Free International.

This article was first published by Care2.com on 09 Jun 2017.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

 

Share on social media:

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail
Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

avatar
Pietje Plezier

I hope this is treu !!!

Darren Jessup

Then the US needs to work on a ban on animals like Trump !

Anne Grice

Hope this carries through to a ban.

M Leybra

Just read that L’Oreal Cosmetics has finally caved to give attention to a lab produced form of human skin to replace the live animals they still use. Yes, cosmetics testing is the least defensible use for animal abuse but every toxic substance in today’s world continues to be tested on animals.

Gwendoline Merrick

Good news!

wpDiscuz

Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days

  1. POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2279 Views]
  2. Karma Strikes Again: Trophy Hunter Killed by Elephant [1124 Views]
  3. POLL: Should all circuses with wild animals be closed down? [977 Views]
  4. ‘Kill them, kill them, kill them’: the volunteer army plotting to wipe out Britain’s grey squirrels [820 Views]
  5. Bald Eagle Adopts Baby Hawk Instead of Eating Him [772 Views]
  6. $10,000 reward offered to find killer of famous Yellowstone white wolf [701 Views]
  7. POLL: Should the Grizzly Bear be removed from the Endangered Species List? [688 Views]
  8. Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [642 Views]
  9. Heroic Boat Captain Rescues Entangled Great White Shark [622 Views]
  10. Elephants Can’t Wait to Meet New Rescued Baby at Sanctuary [617 Views]

Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months

  1. White Killer Whale Adult Spotted for First Time in Wild [42100 Views]
  2. POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farms? [16884 Views]
  3. POLL: Should Congress disband Wildlife “Killing” Services? [11108 Views]
  4. POLL: Should fur farming be banned in the European Union? [9198 Views]
  5. POLL: Should driven grouse-shooting be banned? [8679 Views]
  6. POLL: Should grouse shooting on highland estates be banned? [8246 Views]
  7. POLL: Should China’s dog meat festival be banned? [7448 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the killing of giraffes be outlawed? [4694 Views]
  9. POLL: Should the slaughter of pilot whales in the Faroes be stopped? [4659 Views]
  10. POLL: Should Spain’s “Running of the Bulls” festival be banned? [4609 Views]