Apr 062013
 

The Yangtze population has declined to a mere 1,000 individuals, making the endangered species even more rare than the wild , the 2012 Yangtze Freshwater Survey Report reveals.

 The population in the mainstream of the was less than half of what a similar survey found six years ago, with food shortages and human disturbance such as increased shipping traffic major threats to their survival.

A Yangtze finless porpoise found in , China on April 15 2012. Some 32 finless porpoise deaths have been reported since the beginning of the year.© Xu Dianbo

Every death brings the Finless Porpoise closer to extinction.© Gao Baoyan / WWF

Finless Porpoises lack a dorsal fin.© Gao Baoyan / WWF

The study also found that the rare species annual rate of decline now stands at 13.7 percent, which means that the Yangtze finless porpoise could be extinct as early as the year 2025.

The report comes after a 44-day and 3,400-kilometer round-trip research expedition on the Yangtze River between Yichang in Hubei Province and Shanghai. Led by China’s Ministry of Agriculture and organized by the Institute of Hydrobiology (IHB) at the , WWF and the Wuhan Baiji Fund, the expedition first set sail on 11 November 2012.

The crew visually identified 380 individual Yangtze finless porpoise in the river’s mainstream during the 2012 survey. Based on this observation, scientists determined through analyses that the population in the Yangtze mainstream is about 500, down from 1,225 in 2006.

In October 2012, research was carried out in two adjoining lakes, the Poyang and Dongting, where the population was about 450 and 90, respectively, according to the report.

In a sharp contrast, 851 individuals of Yangtze finless porpoise were visually identified in the mainstream of the Yangtze during the 2006 survey. That research, however, did not cover the two lakes.

“The species is moving fast toward its extinction,” said Wang Ding, head of the research expedition and a professor at the IHB.

Attempts to find traces of the Baiji Dolphin, another rare cetacean and close relative of the finless porpoise, failed during the 2012 survey. The Baiji dolphin was declared “functionally extinct.”

According to data captured by acoustic equipment onboard the observation ships, the largest numbers of finless porpoise were found in the river sections east of Wuhan, with 67 percent recorded between Hukou in Jiangxi Province and Nanjing in Jiangsu Province, the report shows.

There is a notable sign of scattered distribution pattern which could be the result of “shipping traffic that made migration harder, projects that altered hydrological conditions in the middle and lower reaches and habitat loss,” said Wang with the IHB.

The report also cautions that small groups of Yangtze finless porpoise living in comparative isolation may have a negative impact on their ability to reproduce.

There are fewer finless porpoise in the mainstream of the Yangtze while more discoveries were made in wharf and port areas, scientists found.

“They may risk their lives for rich fish bait resources there. But busy shipping traffic close to the port areas poses a threat to the survival of finless porpoise,” said Wang.

“Lack of fishery resources and human disturbances including shipping traffic are among the key threats to the Yangtze finless porpoise survival,” Lei Gang, director of freshwater programme at WWF-China, said.

Researchers found dense distributions of finless porpoise in waters that are not open to navigation and attribute this to less human disturbance. Less optimistic was the discovery of illegal fishing practices in these areas, including traps that could affect finless porpoise.

A set of enhanced measures that include in-situ conservation and ex-situ conservation approaches are essential for efforts of saving the species from its distinction, said Lei.

Given that, the report calls for all-year-round fishing ban for all river dolphin reserves, establishment of a national reserve in Poyang Lake and ex-situ conservation reserves along the Yangtze.

This article was written by Qiu Wei, WWF China

Share on social media:

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblrmail

Leave a Comment

1 Comment on "Yangtze finless porpoise population nosedives to 1,000"

Notify of
avatar
Sort by:   newest | oldest | most voted
trackback

[…] The study also found that the rare species annual rate of decline now stands at 13.7 percent, which means that the Yangtze finless porpoise could be extinct as early as the year 2025. http://focusingonwildlife.com/news/yangtze-finless-porpoise-population-nosedives-to-1000/ […]

wpDiscuz

Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days

  1. Saudi authorities sound warning on illegal hunting in rented farms [1489 Views]
  2. POLL: Should the harvesting of wild turtles be banned? [915 Views]
  3. POLL: Should this Canadian pipeline project be scrapped to save killer whales? [870 Views]
  4. The man saving 30,000 seabirds [787 Views]
  5. 7 stunning forest birds we could soon lose forever [738 Views]
  6. Another Hen Harrier shot dead sparking fears for rare bird of prey [663 Views]
  7. Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [658 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the bear bile trade ban be strictly enforced? [636 Views]
  9. 13 birds that aren’t for the faint of heart [633 Views]
  10. POLL: Should hare coursing be banned in Ireland? [544 Views]

Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months

  1. White Killer Whale Adult Spotted for First Time in Wild [41916 Views]
  2. POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farms? [16649 Views]
  3. POLL: Should the annual Canadian seal hunt be banned? [14027 Views]
  4. POLL: Should fur farming be banned in the European Union? [13443 Views]
  5. POLL: Should Congress disband Wildlife “Killing” Services? [11093 Views]
  6. POLL: Should driven grouse-shooting be banned? [8457 Views]
  7. Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [8416 Views]
  8. POLL: Should grouse shooting on highland estates be banned? [8287 Views]
  9. POLL: Should black bears be killed for Royal Guards’ fur caps? [8019 Views]
  10. POLL: Should China’s dog meat festival be banned? [7319 Views]