POLL: Should animals be kept in zoos and circuses?

  • 1.2K
    Shares


Buenos Aires has announced plans to close down its 140-year-old zoo, arguing that keeping wild animals in captivity and on display is degrading.

Mayor Horacio Rodríguez Larreta said that the zoo’s 2,500 animals will be gradually moved to nature reserves in Argentina which can provide a more suitable environment. The 44-acre zoo in the Palermo neighbourhood will become an ecopark when it is reopened later this year.

“This situation of captivity is degrading for the animals, it’s not the way to take care of them,” said Rodríguez, at a ceremony on Thursday.

Sandra, the orangutan who is legally considered a ‘non-human person’ with rights, will be among the 50 animals that stay behind in the Buenos Aires zoo. Photograph: Juan Mabromata/AFP/Getty Images

The new ecopark will be “a place where children can learn how to take care of and relate with the different species”, the mayor said. “What we have to value is the animals. The way they live here is definitely not the way to do that.”

Some of the zoo’s bird species will be released in the Reserva Ecológica, a riverside ecological reserve covering 864 acres in Buenos Aires. Older animals and those too infirm to be moved will remain at the current site.

The new ecopark will also provide refuge and rehabilitation for animals rescued from illegal trafficking, city officials said. Buenos Aires zoo was one of the city’s main tourist attractions, but despite its popularity, the decaying zoo had been running a loss for its private concessionaires.

It had also attracted bad publicity in recent years, particularly regarding the desperate plight of its captive polar bears during the city’s oppressively hot summers. The zoo’s last remaining polar bear, called Winner, died three and a half years ago partly due to soaring temperatures and inadequate conditions at the zoo.

“The most important thing is breaking with the model of captivity and exhibition,” animal rights lawyer Gerardo Biglia, a long-time campaigner for the closure of this city’s zoo, said in statements to the press. “I think there is a change coming for which we are already prepared because kids nowadays consider it obvious that it’s wrong for animals to be caged.”Among the 50 animals staying behind will be Sandra, an orangutan that made international headlines two years ago when a Buenos Aires court declared her “a non-human person” deserving rights.

“The problem is Sandra is a hybrid of Borneo and Sumatra orangutans so she doesn’t socialize,” Biglia said. But Sandra and the other animals that cannot be moved will no longer be exhibited to the public, city officials said.

This article was first published by The Guardian on 23 Jun 2016.


We invite you to share your opinion whether animals should be kept in zoos and circuses? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page:

Should animals be kept in zoos and circuses?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.



In the event that you voted against the keeping of animals in zoos and circuses, please sign the petition:

USDA! Stop Cruelty to Animals in Aquariums, Zoos, Circuses, Puppy Mills

Thank you for your support.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 1.2K
    Shares


Facebook Comments

14
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
TurtleNekBooySavage
TurtleNekBooySavage

#LetTheAnimalsFree

Toortie Reckers

All animals should be free!

Crissy OD

Me equivoque al dejar mi voto,los ANIMALES NO DEBEN ESTAR EN LOS CIRCOS,ELLOS DEBEN VIVIR LIBREMENTE!!!

Cheryl Good

HELL NO!!

Ann Cann

No, most certainly not. Nor should they be used as props for tourists taking photos, or for any entertainment. In LARGE ZOOS or SANCTUARIES for conservation ONLY.

Berit Helberg

Hmmmm… *checking the calender* yep. we live in 2016. When we – the smart ones and well educated ones – know how to amuse ourselves without abusing other earthlings. We are intellegent enough to find our amusement without torturing or abusing animals. We who know better. Those who are stuck in the middle ages can still not find entertainment on their own…

Anita Venturi

Vote NO

Jack Carone

if the only rhino left is a miserable prisoner, let him/her go.

Josie Brendle

What are they going to do with the animals?? They can’t go back to the wild. So they are just going to shuffle them somewhere else in captivity? Zoos should be shut down gradually, take care of the animals you already have but don’t get any new ones unless they will be put down otherwise. Upgrade and expand your exhibits so it is more natural.

Chris Sharon Edwards

done

Frank Barrachina

Scientifically made zoos will, in the future, be the only places where some animals will be found. People are wiping out some species based upon their archaic beliefs- the rhino species is a good example. It's been decimated because of its horn. Some of us are saddened about this and give financially to various wildlife protection causes and groups but the poaching beat goes on in most places. Tell me, without zoos how do you honestly expect the rhino to survive another twentry years? It's great to be idealistic, and personally I haven't lost all hope, but reality is a… Read more »

Michele Grainger

Some common sense coming into the equation, see which other zoos follow !

Gemie Tortue

MAGNIFIQUE PHOTO TRÈS EXPLICITE IL NOUS DIT VOUS VOYER CE QUE VOUS AVAIS FAIT A NÔTRES PLANÈTE ET TOUT CELA POUR LE FRIC SANS VOUS SOUCIER DE NOUS LES ANIMAUX

Swati Shanti

Never! It’s the birthright of every living creature to be free.