Nov 132017

Animal advocates are celebrating a win for wildlife in Northern California that will protect numerous species from being inhumanely killed by a federal agency that’s become increasingly well-known for its war on wildlife.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services has been in the spotlight for years over its incredibly cruel and wasteful killing of thousands upon thousands of native species, particularly at the behest of the agricultural industry.

Last year, the agency was responsible for killing 2.7 million animals across the country, and its methods continue to put non-target species, pets and people at risk of being injured and killed.

Photo credit: Thinkstock.

Back in June, a coalition of organizations, including the Animal Welfare Institute, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Western Watersheds Project, the Animal Legal Defense Fund, Project Coyote and WildEarth Guardians joined forces to sue the government in an effort to protect wildlife from being needlessly killed. They argued that the agency violated federal law by failing to analyze the environmental impacts of killing hundreds of animals, and now they’re celebrating a major win.

As a result of a settlement that was reached this week, the agency is now going to have to implement numerous protections for wildlife in Northern California.

“Thousands of California wildlife will now have a much needed reprieve from the federal killing agency,” said Animal Legal Defense Fund Executive Director Stephen Wells. “This settlement sends the powerful message that Wildlife Services’ indiscriminate killing programs will not go unchallenged.”

To start, Wildlife Services is going to have to complete a study of the impact and risks of its wildlife-killing program in California’s North District by the end of 2023.

In the meantime, it’s going to have to stop using M-44 cyanide devices, den fumigants and lead ammunition, in addition to having to stop any aerial gunning and will not be able to use any type of body-gripping traps, including snares and steel-jaw leghold traps, in designated Wilderness Areas and Wilderness Study Areas.

The agency will also have to take measures to protect gray wolves, who have only recently returned to the state, from being accidentally killed

“For over two decades, Wildlife Services has relied on cruel and outdated methods, such as steel-jaw leghold traps, in California―despite a statewide ban on private use of such devices,” said Tara Zuardo, Animal Welfare Institute wildlife attorney. “Today’s decision from the court ensures the environmental analysis of the program’s killing of wildlife will receive a much-needed update. California wildlife deserves this protection.”

Hopefully more victories like this will soon follow and lead to better measures that will encourage coexistence with predators and other native species.

This article was first published by on 06 Nov 2017.

We invite you to share your opinion whether Wildlife Services should stop its secret wildlife-killing program? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should Wildlife Services stop its secret wildlife-killing program?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.

Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop wildlife crime. By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.


Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter


Share this post with your friends

Facebook Comments

Leave a Reply

Mongoose Jones

of course it should be stopped!

Maggie Frazier

Should Wildlife Svcs be stopped? Absolutely! They are responsible for millions of wild AND domestic animals deaths. There is no need for this kind of “service”. Forcing farmer & ranchers to use non-lethal methods is something that should have happened long ago. Before any more predators and just plain unfortunate animals have been slaughtered. Frankly, cutting back on grazing allotments on our public lands would be a good start.

Nana Merodis

Anything that gos on pertaining to animals,or our earth should be sneaky shit…


Top-Viewed Posts Last 30 Days

  1. POLL: Should the tradition of throwing wild turkeys from a plane be allowed? – [1911 Views]
  2. POLL: Should the Rare Spirit Bear Be Protected From Hunters? – [1650 Views]
  3. POLL: Should Arizona’s wild cats be protected from trophy hunters? – [1313 Views]
  4. POLL: Should the use of bears as living tourist attractions be banned? – [1195 Views]
  5. POLL: Should animal traps in our National Wildlife Refuges be banned? – [1061 Views]
  6. POLL: Should Dolphinariums As Tourist Attractions Be Closed Down? – [1029 Views]
  7. POLL: Should Orcas and Dolphins be freed from all Seaquariums? – [1023 Views]
  8. POLL: Should the Alaska Refuge be opened up for drilling? – [990 Views]
  9. POLL: Should the testing of cosmetics on animals be banned? – [893 Views]
  10. Penguin disaster as only two chicks survive from colony of 40,000 – [797 Views]

Top-Viewed Posts Last 12 Months

  1. POLL: Should hunting with hounds be banned? – [7645 Views]
  2. Gray Squirrels versus Red Squirrels – The Facts [6651 Views]
  3. POLL: Should foxes be culled to protect domestic pets? [3799 Views]
  4. POLL: Should the trophy hunting of bears and wolves be banned? – [3786 Views]
  5. POLL: Should there be a worldwide ban on fur farming? – [3605 Views]
  6. POLL: Should the slaughter of badgers in the UK be finally stopped? – [3049 Views]
  7. POLL: Should the cruel sport of bullfighting be banned? [2873 Views]
  8. POLL: Should Canada ban the hunting of seals? [2667 Views]
  9. POLL: Should the Tories be allowed to bring back fox hunting? [2578 Views]
  10. POLL: Should wild elephants be sold to Chinese zoos? [2322 Views]