POLL: Should more States suspend this cruel and deadly wildlife program?

  • 219
    Shares


The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s program uses millions of taxpayer dollars — often to hundreds of thousands of wild animals every year.

Earlier this spring, numbers released from the agency showed it killed a shocking 1.3 million native animals last year alone. Not only is the death toll staggering, its use of both cruel and indiscriminate methods from traps, snares and poison to aerial gunning have been called out for being wasteful and ethically and scientifically indefensible. Its actions have also continued to put threatened and , pets and us at risk.

Conservationists and animal advocates have continued to shine a light on what’s happening, and work to hold the agency accountable. They’re celebrating another victory in California this week with an announcement that Shasta County has suspended its contract with the program.

Photo credit: Thinkstock

A coalition of organizations joined forces earlier this summer and filed a notice of intent to sue the county for violating the California Environmental Quality Act, California Endangered Species Act, and the Public Trust Doctrine, among other laws. The organizations included the Animal Legal Defense Fund, the Animal Welfare Institute, the Center for Biological Diversity, the Environmental Protection Information Center, the Foundation, the Natural Resources Defense Council, Project , and WildEarth Guardians.

“Shasta County is home to dozens of threatened and endangered species that are at risk of being maimed or killed by Wildlife Services’ use of archaic and indiscriminate methods,” said Johanna Hamburger, wildlife attorney for the Animal Welfare Institute. “By discontinuing its contract, Shasta County is helping to ensure that these species, which are already struggling to survive, have a better chance at recovery.”

According to the coalition, the county’s contract had allowed for the of hundreds of animals without assessing the ecological damage, or considering alternatives – mainly at the behest of agribusinesses. Over the past eight years, Wildlife Services has killed 72,385 animals in Shasta County using traps, snares and firearms.

In all, Wildlife Services targeted and killed species including black bears, beavers, bobcats, coyotes, deer, foxes, mountain lions, muskrats, raccoons, skunks, squirrels, opossums, thousands upon thousands of birds, including tricolored blackbirds who are protected as a in the state, feral pigs, and three domestic dogs.

“This decision is a major victory for Shasta County’s coyotes, bears and other wildlife,” said Collette Adkins, a biologist and attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity. “All the latest science shows is expensive, ineffective and inhumane. We’re glad Shasta County recognizes there’s no basis for continuing to shoot, trap and strangle thousands of animals every year.”

While it’s too late to save the thousands of animals that have lost their lives, Shasta County’s move is a promising step towards promoting non-lethal alternatives to wildlife management, dealing with “nuisance” animals, and promoting coexistence with wildlife as other places, like Marin County, have already proven possible.

“Many non-lethal alternatives exist that effectively reduce if not eliminate conflicts between live-stock and predators,” said Camilla Fox, founder and executive director of Project Coyote. “Shasta County should follow the lead of counties like Marin that decided to adopt a non- lethal cost-share program in place of the USDA Wildlife Services lethal and indiscriminate program. Marin’s Livestock and Wildlife Protection Program is more cost effective, humane, and has proven that non-lethal methods–including livestock guard animals, Foxlights, and better fencing–are effective predator deterrents.”

This article was first published by Care2.com on 25 Jul 2018.


We invite you to share your opinion whether more States should suspend this cruel and deadly wildlife program? Please vote and leave your comments at the bottom of this page.

Should more States suspend this cruel and deadly wildlife program?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Thank you for voting.


Editorial Comment: The purpose of this poll is to highlight important wildlife conservation issues and to encourage discussion on ways to stop . By leaving a comment and sharing this post you can help to raise awareness. Thank you for your support.

 

Subscribe to our FREE Newsletter

 

Supertrooper

Supertrooper

Founder and Executive Editor

Share this post with your friends

  • 219
    Shares


Facebook Comments

2
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
avatar
mfrazier74@hotmail.com

Absolutely! Not just each individual state – but our federal government should suspend this completely – all over the US. This “program” is responsible for almost eradicating entire species of wildlife. We NEED predators in our environment – removing them damages our wildlife(!!)and its habitats. The number of “accidental” deaths from this agency is unacceptable!

Teri Parsons
Teri Parsons

Why would anyone with a few brain cells desire to kill biological diversity and bio means, “life”? Planet Earth is like the human body or one, living organism, created, supported, sustained, maintained and protected by all its living organisms, which are biological diversity, the organisms of Earth that support her very existence. Scientist: Biological diversity is central to the productivity and sustainability of the Earth’s ecosystems. [Only ecosystems, alone, generate and release all life lines for life itself.]…are the means by which the physical elements of the ecosystem are transformed into the goods and services upon which humankind depends.”